You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2026-10-30] Expense - Not here page opens after switching to table view and deleting expense #103396
Version Number: 9.5.5-0 Reproducible in staging?: Yes Reproducible in production?: N/A - new feature, doesn't exist in prod If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from BrowserStack:#103121 Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):[email protected] Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team Bug source: Exploratory - Significant User Experience Deterioration Device used: Mac 26.5 / Chrome App Component: Money Requests
Action Performed:
Go to staging.new.expensify.com
Go to workspace chat.
Create an expense.
Open the report.
Click More > Switch to table view,
Open the expense row.
Click on the report header.
Click Delete expense > Delete.
Expected Result:
Not here page will not appear after switching to table view and deleting expense.
Actual Result:
Not here page opens after switching to table view and deleting expense.
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
Root cause: The PR lets you open the only expense of a single-expense report from a table row. After you delete that expense from the details page, the details page navigates back to the report underneath. Deleting the last expense also deletes the report, so you land on the "Not here" page. See DynamicReportDetailsPage/index.tsx#L187-L217.
Investigation details
All links point to main at ff03a5d7, which includes the PR.
The feature has no beta gate, so it affects every single-expense report.
Fix for when the feature is re-landed (untested sketch): In navigateToTargetUrl in src/pages/DynamicReportDetailsPage/index.tsx, compute urlToNavigateBack before the side-panel branches. If it points to the parent chat (the report is being deleted), dismiss the modal and go to that chat instead of popping back to the report. Apply the same guard to the track-expense branch. Avoid navigateBackOnDeleteTransaction, because its dismissToSuperWideRHP() call lands on the deleted report again. Add tests for the wide and small-screen stacks with a one-expense report.
changed the title [-]Expense - Not here page opens after switching to table view and deleting expense[/-][+][Due for payment 2026-10-30] Expense - Not here page opens after switching to table view and deleting expense[/+]on Oct 23, 2026
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.5.18-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2026-10-30. 🎊
The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the Contributor+ Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]. If no checklist is needed for this issue, you can click: [no checklist button]
Activity
applause-bot commentedon Oct 7, 2026
While Applause doesn't embed attachments for this bug, here are the links for quick view:
https://platform.applause.com/services/links/v1/external/9f1f71e75c0a6082fe728d633074779ad459db3c66c8a8a972289b2d24506059
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 7, 2026
You have been assigned to this deploy blocker because you recently merged this PR: #103121
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 7, 2026
@Beamanator @daledah you have been assigned to this deploy blocker because you reviewed the offending PR: #103121
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 7, 2026
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source
github-actions commentedon Oct 7, 2026
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 7, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
MelvinBot commentedon Oct 7, 2026
Deploy Blocker Analysis
Causing PR: Add a More menu option to switch single-expense reports between expense view and table view (high confidence).
Recommendation: revert. The revert PR is open and mergeable but needs a review: Revert "Add a More menu option to switch single-expense reports between expense view and table view".
Root cause: The PR lets you open the only expense of a single-expense report from a table row. After you delete that expense from the details page, the details page navigates back to the report underneath. Deleting the last expense also deletes the report, so you land on the "Not here" page. See DynamicReportDetailsPage/index.tsx#L187-L217.
Investigation details
All links point to
mainatff03a5d7, which includes the PR.Before the PR, only reports with two or more expenses had a table, so the report still existed after one deletion.
Other PRs ruled out: Extract Report Details menu rows into self-subscribing components restructures the details page but does not change the after-delete navigation. Other checklist PRs touch unrelated code.
Why revert rather than fix forward: The same PR caused at least six other open deploy blockers:
The feature has no beta gate, so it affects every single-expense report.
Fix for when the feature is re-landed (untested sketch): In
navigateToTargetUrlinsrc/pages/DynamicReportDetailsPage/index.tsx, computeurlToNavigateBackbefore the side-panel branches. If it points to the parent chat (the report is being deleted), dismiss the modal and go to that chat instead of popping back to the report. Apply the same guard to the track-expense branch. AvoidnavigateBackOnDeleteTransaction, because itsdismissToSuperWideRHP()call lands on the deleted report again. Add tests for the wide and small-screen stacks with a one-expense report.view run
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 8, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
19 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 21, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
mitarachim commentedon Oct 21, 2026
Deploy Blocker #104657 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 21, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 22, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
jponikarchuk commentedon Oct 22, 2026
Deploy Blocker #104676 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.
jponikarchuk commentedon Oct 22, 2026
Deploy Blocker #104678 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.
jponikarchuk commentedon Oct 22, 2026
Deploy Blocker #104681 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 22, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
jponikarchuk commentedon Oct 22, 2026
Deploy Blocker #104682 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 22, 2026
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
[-]Expense - Not here page opens after switching to table view and deleting expense[/-][+][Due for payment 2026-10-30] Expense - Not here page opens after switching to table view and deleting expense[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Oct 23, 2026
@daledah
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.5.18-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2026-10-30. 🎊
The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the Contributor+ Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]. If no checklist is needed for this issue, you can click: [no checklist button]