Skip to content

[Due for payment 2026-10-30] Pay someone - Expense details RHP closes after opening it from table view #103394

Closed

Description

@applause-bot

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding. To join our Slack channel, fill out this form.


Version Number: 9.5.5-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: N/A - new feature, doesn't exist in prod
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from BrowserStack: #103121
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Bug source: Exploratory - Significant User Experience Deterioration
Device used: Mac 26.5 / Chrome
App Component: Money Requests

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to 1:1 DM with any user.
  3. Click + > Pay.
  4. Complete the flow to pay the user.
  5. Open the report.
  6. Click More > Switch to table view.
  7. Click on the expense row.

Expected Result:

Expense details RHP will not close.

Actual Result:

Expense details RHP closes after opening it from table view.

On Android, it shows not here page briefly then it closes and returns to table view.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: App
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: App
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • iOS: mWeb Chrome
  • Windows: Chrome
  • MacOS: Chrome Safari

Screenshots/Videos

Bug7280507_1791405156173.6.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Applause Internal Information
Exported by: Mita Rachim
Bug ID: 7280507

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @daledah

Activity

  1. added
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Oct 7, 2026
  2. applause-bot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @applause-bot
    Author

    While Applause doesn't embed attachments for this bug, here are the links for quick view:
    https://platform.applause.com/services/links/v1/external/97cba80638444af5c5955ffd9bf0d075fac1bc60b94f2add63ba5b0068382620

  3. melvin-bot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    You have been assigned to this deploy blocker because you recently merged this PR: #103121

  4. melvin-bot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    @Beamanator @daledah you have been assigned to this deploy blocker because you reviewed the offending PR: #103121

  5. melvin-bot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source

  6. github-actions commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  7. MelvinBot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @MelvinBot
    Contributor

    Deploy Blocker Investigation

    Cause: Add a More menu option to switch single-expense reports between expense view and table view (Expensify/App#103121). Confidence is high. This is a frontend bug, so DeployBlockerCash is correct.

    Recommendation: revert. A revert PR is already open: Revert "Add a More menu option to switch single-expense reports between expense view and table view" (Expensify/App#103390). Merging it should also clear these blockers that link the same PR:

    How the PR causes it

    The PR didn't change the code that breaks. It made that code reachable for "Pay someone" reports for the first time.

    1. The path is new. A "Pay someone" report always has one expense. On production, a one-expense report never shows the table view (prod MoneyRequestReportUtils.ts:172). The PR adds "Switch to table view" for any one-expense report and doesn't exclude "Pay someone" reports (ReportSecondaryActionUtils.ts:1210-1211, MoneyRequestReportUtils.ts:176).
    2. The row press can't find the expense action. The row press (MoneyRequestReportTransactionList.tsx:265) looks up the IOU action that created the expense (useNavigateToTransactionThread.ts:66). In a "Pay someone" report, that action has type pay (SendMoney.ts:153-161). The lookup skips pay actions (ReportActionsUtils.ts:2852-2853, ReportActionsUtils.ts:2878), so it finds nothing.
    3. The app opens an empty thread. With no action found, the hook creates a new expense thread with no link to the expense (useNavigateToTransactionThread.ts:80, Report/index.ts:2494). It then opens that thread in the RHP (useNavigateToTransactionThread.ts:112). This matches the brief "not here" page on Android.
    4. The RHP closes. Likely the server rejects the thread, and the app treats it as deleted and navigates back to the parent report (ReportNavigateAwayHandler.tsx:232-233). This step is inferred from code and not confirmed with a repro.

    Ruled out: the one-transaction redirect. The PR disables it in table view (OneTransactionThreadRedirectHandler.tsx:97), and it doesn't fire for "Pay someone" threads (useIsOneTransactionThread.ts:21).

    If you roll forward instead: hide "Switch to table view" for "Pay someone" reports, or let the lookup in step 2 accept the pay action for those reports.


    Next Steps: Reply with @MelvinBot <your feedback> to refine this analysis.


    view run

  8. melvin-bot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  9. melvin-bot commented on Oct 7, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  10. 20 remaining items

  11. melvin-bot commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  12. mitarachim commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @mitarachim

    Deploy Blocker #104657 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.

  13. melvin-bot commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  14. melvin-bot commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  15. jponikarchuk commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @jponikarchuk

    Deploy Blocker #104676 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.

  16. jponikarchuk commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @jponikarchuk

    Deploy Blocker #104678 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.

  17. jponikarchuk commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @jponikarchuk

    Deploy Blocker #104681 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.

  18. melvin-bot commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  19. jponikarchuk commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @jponikarchuk

    Deploy Blocker #104682 was identified to be related to the PR #103703 that attempted to fix this issue.

  20. melvin-bot commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

    If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

    If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

    If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

  21. changed the title [-]Pay someone - Expense details RHP closes after opening it from table view[/-] [+][Due for payment 2026-10-30] Pay someone - Expense details RHP closes after opening it from table view[/+] on Oct 23, 2026
  22. melvin-bot commented on Oct 23, 2026

    @melvin-bot

    @daledah

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.5.18-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2026-10-30. 🎊

    The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the Contributor+ Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]. If no checklist is needed for this issue, you can click: [no checklist button]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2Engineering

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions