You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2026-10-14] [Insights polish] Update group-by button #102860
[Contributor] The offending PR and associated issue have been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to the comment on the PR:
Link to the comment on the Issue:
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition:
Test:
Sign in with an account that has the Insights beta.
Open the Insights page.
On Spend over time, verify Group by: Month has no background and shows a chevron on the right.
Hover Group by: Month and verify a background appears.
Click Group by: Month and verify the popover opens, the chevron flips, and the background stays while it is open.
Select Week and verify the chart and the label change to Week.
Verify the ⋮ button on every Insights card is 28x28px with a 12px icon and shows a background on hover.
Verify the Spend over time header has the same height as the Top spenders header.
Click ⋮ > View on Spend and verify the Spend page opens.
Go to Home and verify the ⋮ button on the widgets is still 40x40px with a 16px icon.
Activity
Insightsgraphs, move row detail into tooltips, and polish chart styling #102814OlGierd03 commentedon Oct 5, 2026
Hi! I'll be working on this one
16 remaining items
OlGierd03 commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Not overdue, PR has been merged
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (
Awaiting Payment)melvin-bot commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Payment Summary
Resolving PRs:
[NoQA][Insights Polish] Update group-by button #102970
Contributor: @OlGierd03 does not require payment (Contractor)
Reviewer: @truph01 owed $175 via NewDot
BugZero Checklist (@mallenexpensify)
truph01 commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Contributor+ Checklist:
[Contributor] The offending PR and associated issue have been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to the comment on the PR:
Link to the comment on the Issue:
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition:
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
truph01 commentedon Oct 14, 2026
@mallenexpensify This is part of project #317. As we can see, a few completed issues were paid at the old rate of $250.
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 16, 2026
@mallenexpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
mallenexpensify commentedon Oct 16, 2026
Payment Summary
Contributor+: @truph01 due $250 via NewDot
garrettmknight commentedon Oct 19, 2026
$250 approved for @truph01