🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] Add confirmation to table deletion

[seonghobae]

Buyer-visible safeguard

Adds an explicit confirmation step before deleting a table from the Edit Table modal so an accidental click does not immediately remove the table.

Scope

• production behavior is limited to the delete confirmation path in EditTableModal.tsx;
• focused component and modal-coverage tests exercise confirm and cancel behavior;
• CHANGELOG.md records the user-visible safeguard;
• the Jules note remains development metadata;
• no backend, database, dependency, lockfile, workflow, API, or export contract changes are introduced.

Exact-head protected-main reconciliation

Current exact head: b87674a2b8f9b3dc46d4fcbc94c1bf17a403e044.

This is a non-rewriting two-parent reconciliation of predecessor 50c4da9f4b08947bf421c815fe466f5680998b9f and protected main 183331e1054fb14b4c017e77fcd0aae99e949277. Protected main's Vite 8.2.1 manifest and npm lock are preserved exactly. The effective comparison is five intended UI/test/documentation files; the branch is zero commits behind main and GitHub computes it mergeable.

All predecessor verification became historical when this head moved. Merge remains blocked until repository CI, security/SAST, central current-head coverage/review workflows, zero valid unresolved findings, and qualifying independent non-author approval succeed on this unchanged head.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 20 seconds

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d8c5c0af-7fb2-468f-876b-e099ae6f20e2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 466e616 and 03ea73e.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .jules/palette.md
• CHANGELOG.md
• frontend/src/components/modals/EditTableModal.test.tsx
• frontend/src/components/modals/EditTableModal.tsx
• frontend/src/components/modals/ModalCoverage.test.tsx

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

@coderabbitai review

Please review unchanged exact head 50c4da9f4b08947bf421c815fe466f5680998b9f. The implementation remains the bounded table-deletion confirm/cancel contract; the new commit only adds its canonical changelog entry and corrects the related note date. Current-head checks and formal review remain authoritative.

[coderabbitai]

@seonghobae I will review pull request #875 at head 50c4da9f4b08947bf421c815fe466f5680998b9f.

⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[seonghobae]

@opencode-agent review

Please provide a formal exact-head review for b87674a2b8f9b3dc46d4fcbc94c1bf17a403e044 against protected base 183331e1054fb14b4c017e77fcd0aae99e949277. Repository CI, Security Scan, SAST Semgrep, and CodeRabbit status are successful on this unchanged head, with zero unresolved review threads; status checks and comments are not approvals. Please approve only if the exact head satisfies repository policy, otherwise leave actionable current-head findings.

[seonghobae]

@OpenCode review

Please review exact current head 03ea73e after normal current-main reconciliation. Re-evaluate this PR on this head only; do not transfer predecessor evidence. Current-head checks are queued.

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by #915. Current-head comparison shows the same table-delete confirmation feature; #915 also removes the duplicate App-level confirmation so users do not receive two prompts, and carries the updated coverage. #875 has no separate production scope to retain.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by #915. Current-head comparison shows the same table-delete confirmation feature; #915 also removes the duplicate App-level confirmation so users do not receive two prompts, and carries the updated coverage. #875 has no separate production scope to retain.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.