docs: time-bound volatile documentation-fitness inventory

[seonghobae]

Documentation defect

docs/DOCUMENTATION_FITNESS.md is intentionally dated 2026-08-11, but its scope line still claimed to cover every current OriginWeave implementation lane. Live GitHub state has since advanced far beyond the numbered #37–#66 examples in the assessment, so that wording turned dated evidence into an implicit current-inventory claim.

Minimal correction

Against protected-main 0c376acf059be9ddddddfbde1d0189e4f39ef014, this branch changes only the canonical assessment-scope statement so that:

• the numbered active-PR examples are explicitly the implementation lanes observed on the assessment date;
• live GitHub PR/issue state supersedes those examples for current inventory; and
• the durable product decisions remain reconstructable without chat history.

CHANGELOG.md records the documentation-contract change as required by AGENTS.md.

Exact-head evidence

At exact head 74db58c2bb428b0db69bd1114c7120b13df288f6 against exact protected-main 0c376acf059be9ddddddfbde1d0189e4f39ef014:

• CI 31774026673: success;
• Rust-contract job: repository contracts, formatting, locked workspace check/tests, strict Clippy, and rustdoc all success;
• exact owned-production function/line/region/branch coverage job: success;
• Security Scan 31774026695: success for the executed OSV, Scorecard, and Trivy lanes; the dependency-review action was skipped after its support check and is therefore not represented as an executed dependency-review pass;
• SAST Semgrep 31774026718: success;
• CodeRabbit exact-head status: success;
• no formal reviews or inline review threads are currently returned; and
• GitHub reports the PR mergeable against the exact protected-main base.

Truth boundary

This PR does not rewrite the dated 2026-08-11 assessment to pretend that it was performed on 2026-08-14, does not promote active PRs to protected-main truth, and does not change PRD/TRD/ADR/UML/ERD implementation maturity. It removes only the false temporal implication that old numbered examples are a live inventory.

Passing automation is not independent approval, and the scheduled actor does not merge or self-approve.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 문서
  • 문서 적합성 평가 기준을 최신화했습니다.
  • 보호된 기본 브랜치와 평가일의 구현 상태를 평가 범위로 명확히 했습니다.
  • 활성 PR 및 이슈는 실시간 상태를 우선하며, 번호가 매겨진 예시는 날짜가 있는 평가 증거로 취급하도록 안내합니다.
  • 과거 브랜치의 사례가 현재 구현 상태로 오해되지 않도록 기준을 보완했습니다.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6670a265-4591-4d9e-b037-87c67f4d4185

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74db58c and a6373fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CHANGELOG.md

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 09682286-5162-4bb8-9e55-8817ab813f8c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c376ac and 74db58c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• CHANGELOG.md
• docs/DOCUMENTATION_FITNESS.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

문서 적합성 평가 범위가 구체화되었습니다. 활성 PR과 이슈는 실시간 GitHub 상태로 확인하며, 번호가 있는 활성 PR 예시는 날짜가 있는 평가 증거로 취급합니다.

Changes

문서 적합성 기준

Layer / File(s)	Summary
평가 범위 및 증거 기준 docs/DOCUMENTATION_FITNESS.md, CHANGELOG.md	평가 범위를 보호된 main, 평가일의 관찰된 구현 레인, 재구성 가능한 제품 결정으로 제한했습니다. 활성 PR과 이슈의 현재 상태는 실시간 GitHub 인벤토리로 확인하도록 명시했습니다. 번호가 있는 활성 PR 예시는 날짜가 있는 평가 증거로 정의했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 74db5

This PR makes a narrowly scoped documentation clarification and records it in the changelog; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 문서 적합성 인벤토리를 시간 기준의 변동 문서로 명확히 변경한 PR의 주요 내용을 정확하게 요약합니다.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/documentation-fitness-live-inventory

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

@opencode-agent Review the exact current head 74db58c2bb428b0db69bd1114c7120b13df288f6 against exact base 0c376acf059be9ddddddfbde1d0189e4f39ef014. Publish a formal current-head PR review only after real-model analysis and adversarial validation. Do not use deterministic fallback evidence, do not change the branch, and do not merge.

[seonghobae]

@cwl-noema-review

Please perform an independent review of exact head 74db58c2bb428b0db69bd1114c7120b13df288f6 against protected base 0c376acf059be9ddddddfbde1d0189e4f39ef014. Submit a formal review only if the exact current head is acceptable; do not reuse predecessor-head evidence.

[cursor]

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.