docs: establish authoritative automation control-plane specifications - #896
docs: establish authoritative automation control-plane specifications#896seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 46 minutes Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (52)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Canonical-documentation consolidation review on exact head Required delta on this existing branch, after refetching both live heads:
After those are exact-head green, request current automated review. Do not merge both #886 and #896; preserve one canonical history and close the other only after verifying no unique accepted decision was dropped. |
|
@coderabbitai review @cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Review only exact current head |
|
I will evaluate the requested documentation graph and its machine contracts as
|
|
@coderabbitai review @cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Review only exact current head |
|
I will evaluate the documentation graph as
|
|
@coderabbitai review @cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Review only exact current head |
Rate Limit Exceeded
|
|
@coderabbitai review Review only exact current head |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
expected_head="aed69a1f2051ae10fde3e39cf7a1957d94233676"
printf '%s\n' '== Checked-out commit =='
git rev-parse HEAD
git status --short
printf '%s\n' '== Commit match =='
test "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" = "$expected_head" && echo "MATCH" || echo "MISMATCH"
printf '%s\n' '== PR metadata =='
gh pr view 896 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github \
--json number,state,baseRefName,headRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup \
--jq '{number,state,baseRefName,headRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup}'
printf '%s\n' '== Exact-head check runs =='
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${expected_head}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | [.name,.status,.conclusion,.details_url] | `@tsv`' || true
printf '%s\n' '== Exact-head legacy statuses =='
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${expected_head}/status" \
--jq '.statuses[]? | [.context,.state,.target_url] | `@tsv`' || true
printf '%s\n' '== Changed files =='
gh pr view 896 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github --json files \
--jq '.files[].path'
printf '%s\n' '== Candidate canonical documents, tests, and workflows =='
fd -t f . docs .github tests 2>/dev/null \
| rg -i '(README|PRD|TRD|ARCHITECTURE|UML|ERD|DATA.MODEL|SECURITY|THREAT|TRACEABILITY|OPERAB|RUNBOOK|CONTINUATION|ADR|CONTRACT|DOCTOR|DOCUMENT|QUALITY|WORKFLOW)' \
| sort
printf '%s\n' '== Relevant authoritative-document evidence =='
rg -n -i -C 2 \
'implemented_on_protected_main|active_pr|accepted_architecture|research_only|out_of_scope|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|double.fresh|double.exit|no.soft.timeout|source_revision|live.base|merge_revision|FigJam|ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018|ISO/IEC 25010:2023|SLSA 1\.2|SSDF' \
docs .github tests 2>/dev/null || true
printf '%s\n' '== Documentation CI and coverage workflow evidence =='
rg -n -i -C 3 \
'Automation Documentation Quality CI|100%|coverage|checkout|github\.sha|event.*sha|documentation' \
.github/workflows 2>/dev/null || trueLength of output: 202554 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
head_sha="aed69a1f2051ae10fde3e39cf7a1957d94233676"
echo "== Exact commit identity =="
printf 'checked_out='
git rev-parse HEAD
printf 'expected=%s\n' "$head_sha"
printf 'match='
if test "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" = "$head_sha"; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
echo "== Pull request state =="
gh pr view 896 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github \
--json state,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision \
--jq '{state,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision}'
echo "== Exact-head checks: non-success states =="
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${head_sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion,details_url}]'
echo "== Exact-head checks: counts by conclusion =="
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${head_sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[].conclusion] | sort | group_by(.) | map({conclusion: .[0], count: length})'
echo "== Exact-head legacy-status failures =="
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${head_sha}/status" \
--jq '[.statuses[]? | select(.state != "success") | {context,state,target_url}]'
echo "== Canonical documentation candidates =="
fd -t f -i 'README.md' docs 2>/dev/null | sort
fd -t f . docs 2>/dev/null \
| rg -i '/(prd|trd|architecture|uml|erd|data.model|security|threat|traceability|operability|runbook|continuation|adr|audit|standards)' \
| sort
echo "== Documentation contract test candidates =="
fd -t f . tests 2>/dev/null | rg -i '(document|documentation|contract|doctor)' | sort
echo "== Canonical document headings =="
for f in $(fd -t f -e md docs 2>/dev/null | rg -i '/(prd|trd|architecture|uml|erd|data.model|security|threat|traceability|operability|runbook|continuation|audit|standards|adr-0007)' | sort); do
echo "--- $f"
rg -n '^#{1,3} ' "$f" | head -n 50
done
echo "== Requested contract terms in documentation and tests =="
rg -l -i \
'implemented_on_protected_main|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|no.soft.timeout|double.*(exit|sweep)|source_revision|merge_revision|ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018|ISO/IEC 25010:2023' \
docs tests 2>/dev/null | sort | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f"
rg -n -i \
'implemented_on_protected_main|active_pr|accepted_architecture|planned|research_only|superseded|out_of_scope|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|no.soft.timeout|double.*(exit|sweep)|source_revision|live.base|merge_revision|ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018|ISO/IEC 25010:2023' \
"$f" | head -n 80
doneLength of output: 53603 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "== Documentation quality workflow candidates =="
fd -t f -e yml -e yaml .github/workflows | while read -r f; do
if rg -q -i 'automation documentation quality|test_automation_documentation_contract|documentation.*contract|full repository suite|coverage.*100|fail-under=100' "$f"; then
echo "$f"
fi
done
echo "== Documentation quality workflow focused content =="
fd -t f -e yml -e yaml .github/workflows | while read -r f; do
if rg -q -i 'automation documentation quality|test_automation_documentation_contract|documentation.*contract' "$f"; then
echo "--- $f"
rg -n -i -C 3 \
'name:|pull_request:|paths:|checkout|head\.sha|github\.sha|pytest|test_automation_documentation_contract|coverage|fail-under' \
"$f"
fi
done
echo "== Focused documentation contract assertions =="
sed -n '1,360p' tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py
echo "== Static Markdown link and fence validation under docs/automation =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re
root = Path.cwd()
docs = root / "docs" / "automation"
errors = []
for path in sorted(docs.rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
for raw in re.findall(r'(?<!!)\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+"[^"]*")?\)', text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith("mailto:") or target.startswith("#"):
continue
candidate = (path.parent / target).resolve()
if not candidate.exists():
errors.append(f"missing link target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
raise SystemExit(1)
print("PASS: Markdown fences are balanced and local relative link targets exist.")
PY
echo "== Exact-head check state, refreshed =="
head_sha="aed69a1f2051ae10fde3e39cf7a1957d94233676"
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${head_sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion,details_url}]'Length of output: 2956 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "== Documentation quality workflow candidates =="
fd -t f -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows | while read -r f; do
if rg -q -i 'automation documentation quality|test_automation_documentation_contract|documentation.*contract|full repository suite|coverage.*100|fail-under=100' "$f"; then
echo "$f"
fi
done
echo "== Documentation quality workflow focused content =="
fd -t f -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows | while read -r f; do
if rg -q -i 'automation documentation quality|test_automation_documentation_contract|documentation.*contract' "$f"; then
echo "--- $f"
rg -n -i -C 3 \
'name:|pull_request:|paths:|checkout|head\.sha|github\.sha|pytest|test_automation_documentation_contract|coverage|fail-under' \
"$f"
fi
done
echo "== Focused documentation contract assertions =="
sed -n '1,360p' tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py
echo "== Static Markdown link and fence validation under docs/automation =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re
root = Path.cwd()
docs = root / "docs" / "automation"
errors = []
for path in sorted(docs.rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
for raw in re.findall(r'(?<!!)\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+"[^"]*")?\)', text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith("mailto:") or target.startswith("#"):
continue
candidate = (path.parent / target).resolve()
if not candidate.exists():
errors.append(f"missing link target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
raise SystemExit(1)
print("PASS: Markdown fences are balanced and local relative link targets exist.")
PY
echo "== Exact-head check state, refreshed =="
head_sha="aed69a1f2051ae10fde3e39cf7a1957d94233676"
gh api "repos/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/commits/${head_sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion,details_url}]'Length of output: 130806
I found no source-backed actionable defect in the reviewed documentation graph. The checked-out commit matches the PR head. The documentation index, controlled maturity states, central-versus-leaf ownership audit, revision and evidence authority model, continuation contract, conceptual ERD entities, ADR set, standards baseline, and documentation contract tests are present. Local Markdown fences are balanced. Local relative links resolve.
Current acceptance evidence is incomplete. The exact-head You are interacting with an AI system. |
|
Exact-head documentation review requested: This head preserves the already-audited documentation baseline and updates only the redaction lineage/contract: #888 is closed-unmerged @cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Please review this exact head. Its 11 Actions workflows are currently queued/in progress, so predecessor success and pending checks are not acceptance. A model comment/check/status is also not a qualifying independent formal approval. |
|
Exact-head documentation review requested: The continuation handoff sink/acknowledgement contract is aligned across the enabled hourly automation prompt, Automation Documentation Quality CI run 31321656195 checked out this exact head and completed successfully: @cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Please review only this exact current head. Do not carry forward predecessor-head evidence, mutate the branch, merge, retarget, or change rulesets. A current automated source review and a qualifying independent non-author formal approval remain separate required authorities. |
|
@coderabbitai review @cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Review only exact current head |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/.github"
pr="896"
expected_head="4dbf099fc55d13e0af677a39c9221b462112af61"
echo "== Exact commit identity =="
actual_head="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
printf 'checked_out=%s\nexpected=%s\nmatch=%s\n' \
"$actual_head" "$expected_head" \
"$(test "$actual_head" = "$expected_head" && echo yes || echo no)"
git status --short
echo "== Pull request identity and review state =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" \
--json number,state,baseRefName,baseRefOid,headRefName,headRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision \
--jq '{number,state,baseRefName,baseRefOid,headRefName,headRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision}'
echo "== Exact-head checks not completed successfully =="
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${expected_head}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion,details_url}]'
echo "== Files changed at requested head =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json files --jq '.files[].path' | sort
echo "== Candidate authoritative files =="
fd -t f . docs tests .github 2>/dev/null \
| rg -i '(adr-000[47]|architecture|erd|data.model|traceability|continuation|doctor|standards|audit|prd|trd|documentation.*contract|automation-documentation-quality)' \
| sort
echo "== Authoritative headings and focused contract text =="
for f in \
$(fd -t f -e md docs 2>/dev/null | rg -i '(adr-000[47]|architecture|erd|data.model|traceability|continuation|doctor|standards|audit|prd|trd)' | sort) \
$(fd -t f -e py tests 2>/dev/null | rg -i '(automation.*documentation.*contract|documentation.*contract)' | sort) \
$(fd -t f -e yml -e yaml .github/workflows 2>/dev/null | rg -i 'automation.*documentation.*quality'); do
echo "--- $f"
rg -n -i -C 2 \
'fixed.wall.clock|no.soft.timeout|two.fresh|double.*(exit|sweep)|COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN|central|leaf.owner|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|logical|persistence|evidence.authority|ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018|ISO/IEC 25010:2023|SLSA 1\.2|SSDF|github\.sha|event.*sha|fail-under|coverage' \
"$f" || true
done
echo "== Static local Markdown link and fence validation =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re, sys
root = Path.cwd()
errors = []
for path in sorted((root / "docs").rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
for raw in re.findall(r'(?<!!)\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+"[^"]*")?\)', text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith(("mailto:", "#")):
continue
if not (path.parent / target).resolve().exists():
errors.append(f"missing target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
sys.exit(1)
print("PASS")
PYLength of output: 7206 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "== Commit-level diff summary =="
git diff --stat 6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba..HEAD
git diff --name-status 6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba..HEAD
echo "== ADR-0007: work conservation and fresh-exit rules =="
sed -n '1,280p' docs/automation/adr/0007-work-conserving-maintenance.md
echo "== ADR-0004: explicit secret contracts and retired alias =="
sed -n '1,280p' docs/automation/adr/0004-explicit-secret-contracts.md
echo "== Central versus leaf ownership audit =="
sed -n '1,300p' docs/automation/DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT.md
echo "== Logical data model and ERD =="
sed -n '1,320p' docs/automation/DATA_MODEL.md
sed -n '1,260p' docs/automation/ERD.md
echo "== Evidence authority and identity model =="
rg -n -i -C 4 \
'evidence.authorit|source_revision|pr.base|live.base|merge_revision|check|status|review|model.output|authority' \
docs/automation/{ARCHITECTURE.md,TRD.md,TRACEABILITY.md,PRD.md,EVENT_CONTRACTS.md}
echo "== Standards baseline =="
sed -n '1,320p' docs/doctoring/automation-control-plane-standards.md
echo "== Retired alias: every repository occurrence =="
rg -n -i -C 3 --hidden -g '!.git/**' 'COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN' . || true
echo "== Documentation quality workflow =="
sed -n '1,260p' .github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml
echo "== Documentation contract tests: relevant assertions =="
rg -n -i -C 5 \
'ADR-0007|ADR-0004|fixed.wall.clock|no.soft.timeout|two.fresh|double.*(exit|sweep)|COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN|central|leaf|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|evidence.authority|29148|25010|doctoring|checkout|coverage' \
tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py \
tests/test_automation_historical_loop_supersession_contract.py \
tests/test_automation_doctoring_index_contract.py
echo "== Test file structure and full requested-contract test =="
ast-grep outline tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py --items all --view expanded
sed -n '1,460p' tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.pyLength of output: 205470
I found no source-backed actionable defect in the requested documentation scope. The reviewed sources show these controls:
I cannot give an acceptance or approval verdict yet. The exact-head
|
|
@coderabbitai full review |
|
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (6 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs (42 files)"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (3 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V4["targeted test run"]
Merge Conflict Guidance
gh pr checkout 896 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github
git fetch origin main
git merge --no-ff origin/main # or: git rebase origin/main
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files>
# merge path: git commit
# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:docs/automation-control-plane-specs-20260809
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:docs/automation-control-plane-specs-20260809 |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and requested changes before merge.
Findings
1. P2 .github/workflows/strix.yml:41 - strix.yml concurrency comment claims cancellation behavior this PR does not implement
- Problem: The new comment states concurrency is 'event-class/repository/PR-number scoped and cancels obsolete work within that class. Separate event classes keep a default-branch dispatch from cancelling the required pull_request_target context,' implying a functional concurrency redesign. The PR diff for .github/workflows/strix.yml is 4 added + 4 removed comment lines only (diff stat '8 +-'); the concurrency block is byte-identical to base, and the removed base lines documented the actual contract: runs 'intentionally do not cancel in progress because a pre-job cancellation leaves no scanner log to review.' Observable impact: after merge, the workflow prose promises cancellation and event-class separation that do not exist, so a default-branch repository_dispatch can still overlap or preempt a required pull_request_target scan and queue pressure remains unhandled, contradicting the PR's own documentation-reconciliation intent. Trigger condition: any operator or agent reading strix.yml concurrency comments to schedule dispatches, or a future maintainer trusting the comment while editing concurrency.
- Root cause: Comment-only edit: the author described an intended concurrency redesign (event-class/repository/PR-number grouping with cancel-in-progress) but the corresponding concurrency: block change was not made or not included in this diff, leaving the prose describing nonexistent behavior.
- Fix: Either implement the described concurrency block in strix.yml (e.g., group: strix-${{ github.event_name }}-${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref }} with cancel-in-progress: true, keeping repository_dispatch and pull_request_target in separate event classes) OR restore a comment that accurately describes the unchanged non-cancelling behavior; do not merge a workflow whose comment contradicts its own executable configuration.
- Regression test: python3 -m pytest tests/test_strix_workflow_dependency_hashes.py tests/test_strix_nvidia_nim_not_found_fallback.py -q, plus add a source-level contract assertion in the existing strix workflow-contract test that ties the concurrency group/cancel-in-progress keys to whatever the comment claims, so future comment/code drift fails CI.
- Suggested diff: posted in this finding's inline review thread.
Summary
REQUEST_CHANGES for PR #896 (docs: establish authoritative automation control-plane specifications; base 6eb06cd..head 26c7a8c, repository ContextualWisdomLab/.github). The PR establishes the authoritative automation documentation graph (docs/automation/ARCHITECTURE, AUTONOMY_THREATS, CONTINUATION_RUNBOOK, DATA_MODEL, DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT, ERD, EVENT_CONTRACTS, INCIDENT_RUNBOOK, OPERABILITY, PRD, README, RUNBOOK, SECURITY, TEST_STRATEGY, THREAT_MODEL, TRACEABILITY, TRD, UML, ADRs 0001-0016, doctoring standards), reconciles AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md/README/CHANGELOG supersession guidance, adds machine-checkable contracts (tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py, tests/test_automation_doctoring_index_contract.py, tests/test_automation_historical_loop_supersession_contract.py, test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py +12), adds the new hash-pinned full-suite workflow .github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml (Python 3.14, exact-head checkout ref=${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }}, pip --require-hashes, coverage --fail-under=100, compileall), and makes comment-only edits to .github/workflows/pr-review-merge-scheduler.yml and .github/workflows/strix.yml. Inspected changed-file evidence and focused hunks for .github/workflows/strix.yml, .github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml, .github/workflows/pr-review-merge-scheduler.yml, AGENTS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, CHANGELOG.md. Blocking P2 finding: .github/workflows/strix.yml:41 claims concurrency is 'event-class/repository/PR-number scoped and cancels obsolete work within that class. Separate event classes keep a default-branch dispatch from cancelling the required pull_request_target context,' yet the base..head diff stat shows strix.yml | 8 +- (4 added, 4 removed comment lines only), the concurrency block is unchanged from base, the removed base text states Strix runs 'intentionally do not cancel in progress because a pre-job cancellation leaves no scanner log to review', and neither tests/test_strix_workflow_dependency_hashes.py nor tests/test_strix_nvidia_nim_not_found_fallback.py (the covering workflow-contract tests per CodeGraph) asserts the claimed concurrency semantics. DAG: flowchart LR A['docs/automation graph (PRD/TRD/ADR/UML/SECURITY)'] --> B['machine-checkable contract tests (tests/test_automation_)'] --> C['automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml (coverage 100%, compileall)']; A --> D['strix.yml:41 concurrency comment'] --> E['claims cancellation absent from unchanged concurrency block (P2)'] --> F['align comment or add concurrency block plus contract assertion']; C --> G['exact-head artifact gate (ref=head.sha)']. Approval sufficiency: not granted because changed documentation contradicts current code inside the same changed file. Verification posture: Coverage execution evidence Result: PASS with supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed/advisory; Failed GitHub Check evidence: no completed failed checks at head 26c7a8c; mergeStateStatus blocked is branch-policy/review state, not DIRTY/CONFLICTING conflict evidence. Linter/static: no actionlint in repository test_commands; workflow hunks inspected directly; the new workflow mirrors the repository's existing exact-head/hash-pinned quality pattern (agent-mention-router-quality-ci.yml per workflow_versions Python 3.14). TDD/regression: new doc-contract tests cover the graph and supersession; scheduler hunk is comment-only because the untouched if condition already evaluates github.event.schedule == '/15 * * * *'. Coverage: permanent 100% gate enforced by the new workflow and corroborated by PASS coverage evidence. Docstring coverage: interrogate --fail-under=100 contract reported passed/advisory in coverage evidence. DAG: source-backed flowchart above reflects base-to-head changed flow. PoC/execution: no web surface; evidence is trusted current-head diff, CodeGraph, and coverage-execution traces; no OPENCODE_EXECUTION_RECEIPT required for non-web surfaces and none fabricated. DDD/domain: central control-plane boundary documented consistently with ARCHITECTURE.md index and ADR-0008. CDD/context: docs reference existing workflows and scripts (agent_mention_router.py, strix.yml, pr_review_merge_scheduler.py) confirmed present in the head index. Similar issues: strix.yml changed at 9a86fa9/edd9a37f in PR history with matching contract-test coverage expectations. Claim/concept check: sixteen ADRs, COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN retirement, and fixed-wall-clock supersession claims are reconciled by ADR-0004/ADR-0007, CHANGELOG entries, and the historical-loop-supersession contract test; no external standards needed. Standards search: GitHub Actions schedule/concurrency semantics verified against the workflow source itself; no numerical/ML references in this PR. Compatibility/convention: no new DB/API/route identifiers; workflow and env names are descriptive multi-word tokens (FORCE_JAVASCRIPT_ACTIONS_TO_NODE24, PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE are repository conventions); action pins use immutable SHA with version comments per repo convention; runtime versions Python 3.14/Node24 not challenged from model memory. Breaking-change/backcompat: the new workflow makes docs/PR path changes run the full suite plus 100% coverage (intended per PR body); scheduler/strix changes are comment-only with no behavior delta. Performance: scheduler cadence unchanged (cron already */15); new workflow bounded by timeout-minutes 20 with concurrency cancel-in-progress for PR pushes. Developer experience: AGENTS.md now routes agents to docs/automation/README.md with traceability/ADR update duties; actionable and consistent with sibling repo conventions. User experience: non-web surface (workflow comments, docs, log output); the inaccurate strix.yml comment misleads operators and agents about security-scan cancellation semantics. Visual/DOM: non-web changes; per contract the CLI/workflow/docs surface is the reviewed interaction surface instead of Playwright/DOM evidence. Accessibility/i18n: no UI change; docs are plain English. Supply-chain/license: new workflow installs with --require-hashes from requirements-opencode-review-ci-hashes.txt, immutable action pins, and step-security egress audit; no new dependencies. Packaging: pyproject.toml (Python >=3.10), pip/coverage/interrogate/pytest contracts present; unpackaged_source_surfaces empty. Security/privacy: pull_request_target paths-ignore semantics unchanged; exact-head checkout with persist-credentials false and contents: read only; no new secrets; the misleading cancellation claim could encourage unsafe concurrency assumptions around required security scans.
Adversarial validation
{"status":"failed","probes":[{"path":".github/workflows/strix.yml","line":41,"hypothesis":"The replacement comment asserts Strix concurrency is event-class/repository/PR-number scoped and cancels obsolete work, yet the head workflow never changed its concurrency block, so the claimed behavior does not exist at head.","attack_or_counterexample":"Stack a default-branch repository_dispatch while a pull_request_target scan for the same PR is running: with the unchanged block the runs overlap and no class-scoped cancellation exists, so a dispatch can still preempt or overlap the required PR scan and no scanner-log-preserving cancellation is present.","evidence":"Current-head diff trace: diff stat shows .github/workflows/strix.yml | 8 +- and the only hunk is -4/+4 comment lines, leaving the concurrency block byte-identical to base whose removed text explicitly stated Strix runs intentionally do not cancel in progress because a pre-job cancellation leaves no scanner log to review; CodeGraph covering tests (tests/test_strix_workflow_dependency_hashes.py, tests/test_strix_nvidia_nim_not_found_fallback.py) assert hashes and provider fallback, not the claimed concurrency semantics; trusted source trace at .github/workflows/strix.yml:41 observed the contested claim exists only in comment text with no implementing concurrency change; source-line-sha256=0580bbb47dfc55eef3b5b10179fd6367b01b5c6d5285333ee8bc310ff3c6906f","outcome":"confirmed"},{"path":".github/workflows/pr-review-merge-scheduler.yml","line":556,"hypothesis":"The hourly-to-15-minute heartbeat comment edit could drift from the real schedule trigger and misrepresent the org sweep cadence.","attack_or_counterexample":"A schedule whose if condition referenced a different cron than the new comment would make the documentation false and change sweep cadence relative to the stated contract.","evidence":"Current-head hunk trace: the only change is the comment line at .github/workflows/pr-review-merge-scheduler.yml:556 ('every organization repository on a 15-minute heartbeat'); the untouched surrounding if condition in the same hunk already evaluates (github.event_name == 'schedule' && github.event.schedule == '*/15 * * * *') at base, so the edit only reconciles prose with the pre-existing cron and no scheduling behavior changed; trusted source trace at .github/workflows/pr-review-merge-scheduler.yml:556 observed the comment/cron agreement; source-line-sha256=617966aedba9fa3573274a76f3107e7f70a87e5e8ed79f78edd0d181c50be94f","outcome":"falsified"},{"path":".github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml","line":74,"hypothesis":"The new full-suite job with a permanent 100% coverage gate and hash-pinned install could fail on this PR's own doc-contract tests, or the checkout could measure GitHub's merge revision instead of the exact head.","attack_or_counterexample":"A docs-only PR triggering the paths filter whose suite failed the coverage --fail-under=100 gate, or a checkout that omits ref and measures the merge commit.","evidence":"Trusted coverage execution evidence reports Result: PASS with supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed/advisory; the workflow's checkout pins ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }} (exact-head, matching the repository's established two-checkout exact-head contract) and Failed GitHub Check evidence lists no completed failed checks for head 26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b; trusted source trace at .github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml:74 observed the exact-head ref and gate behavior; source-line-sha256=f732055dbb2f88915f634e2e105262e6f305614d620a60e86d6588042333f8f6","outcome":"falsified"}],"residual_risk":"Until the strix.yml comment is aligned with the unchanged concurrency block (or the block is actually implemented), operators and agents reading the workflow may assume security-scan cancellation that does not exist, leaving PR-scan queue pressure unhandled exactly as the removed comment warned. The new documentation-quality workflow adds one full-suite 100%-coverage job per docs/PR change, increasing CI cost on every documentation push. Behavioral claims in the new docs graph are active_pr documentation and their runtime maturity remains separately tracked per the PR body."}-
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: The changed strix.yml comment claims Strix concurrency is now event-class/repository/PR-number scoped and cancels obsolete work, but this PR changes only four comment lines (+4/-4) and the concurrency block is byte-identical to base; head behavior therefore does not implement the described cancellation, contradicting the removed base comment that runs intentionally do not cancel in progress.
-
Head SHA:
26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b -
Workflow run: 31355250619
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (6 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs (43 files)"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Docs (43 files)"]
R3 --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (4 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test (4 files)"]
R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
Dismissed after exact-head source revalidation falsified the finding and the only thread was resolved with preserved evidence. At 26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b, the executable Strix block already has event-class/repository/PR grouping and cancel-in-progress: true; this PR corrects stale prose to match unchanged executable behavior. This dismissal is not approval, qualifying human review, merge authority, or protected-main acceptance.
|
@opencode-agent review Re-evaluate exact unchanged head |
|
@coderabbitai review Please perform a fresh read-only semantic review of exact unchanged head Revalidate required/indexed document coverage, exact status vocabulary, ADR index/status consistency, Mermaid and local-link integrity, evidence-channel separation, current-live-base semantics, conceptual-versus-persisted data labels, explicit secret contracts, canonical ownership, same-invocation continuation, and the corrected Strix concurrency prose against the unchanged executable workflow. Do not infer shipped behavior, qualifying human approval, certification, or merge authority from this automated review. |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/.github"
pr="896"
head_sha="26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b"
base_sha="6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba"
echo "== Revision identity =="
printf 'checked_out=%s\n' "$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
printf 'expected_head=%s\n' "$head_sha"
test "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" = "$head_sha" && echo "head_match=yes" || echo "head_match=no"
printf 'base_object='
git cat-file -t "$base_sha"
printf 'head_object='
git cat-file -t "$head_sha"
echo "== PR identity and exact-head checks =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" \
--json state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision \
--jq '{state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision}'
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head_sha/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion}]'
echo "== Documentation map =="
fd -t f -e md docs | sort | rg '(automation|doctoring)' || true
echo "== Documentation index and ADR index =="
for f in docs/automation/README.md docs/automation/INDEX.md docs/automation/ADR.md; do
test -f "$f" && { echo "--- $f"; sed -n '1,260p' "$f"; }
done
echo "== Required terms across authoritative documentation =="
rg -n -i -C 2 \
'implemented_on_protected_main|active_pr|accepted_architecture|planned|research_only|superseded|out_of_scope|source_revision|pr.base|live.base|merge_revision|evidence.authority|conceptual|not.*persist|deployed.*database|central.*own|leaf.*own|same.invocation|no.soft.timeout|two.*fresh|double.*(exit|sweep)|COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN|secret' \
docs/automation docs/doctoring 2>/dev/null | head -n 1800
echo "== ADR status headings and index references =="
for f in $(fd -t f -e md docs/automation/adr | sort); do
echo "--- $f"
rg -n -m 12 '^(#|##) |[Ss]tatus|[Mm]aturity' "$f"
done
echo "== Strix workflow: base versus head executable concurrency and nearby prose =="
fd -t f . .github/workflows | rg -i 'strix' | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f (base)"
git show "$base_sha:$f" 2>/dev/null | rg -n -i -C 5 'concurrency|cancel-in-progress|non-cancell|cancel' || true
echo "--- $f (head)"
git show "$head_sha:$f" 2>/dev/null | rg -n -i -C 5 'concurrency|cancel-in-progress|non-cancell|cancel' || true
echo "--- diff"
git diff --unified=12 "$base_sha" "$head_sha" -- "$f"
done
echo "== Documentation contract-test coverage =="
fd -t f -e py tests | rg -i '(automation.*documentation|documentation.*contract|doctoring)' | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f"
rg -n -i -C 2 \
'maturity|ADR|Mermaid|link|evidence|live.base|conceptual|persist|secret|ownership|continuation|soft.timeout|fresh.exit|strix|concurrency' \
"$f" || true
done
echo "== Markdown local links, fences, and Mermaid fences =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re, sys
root = Path.cwd()
errors = []
mermaid = 0
for path in sorted((root / "docs").rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
mermaid += len(re.findall(r'^```mermaid\s*$', text, re.M))
for raw in re.findall(r'(?<!!)\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+"[^"]*")?\)', text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith(("mailto:", "#")):
continue
if not (path.parent / target).resolve().exists():
errors.append(f"missing target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
print(f"mermaid_fences={mermaid}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
sys.exit(1)
print("local_links_and_fences=PASS")
PYLength of output: 220072 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "== ADR index completeness and status consistency =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re, sys
root = Path("docs/automation/adr")
index = (root / "README.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
files = sorted(p for p in root.glob("*.md") if p.name != "README.md")
errors = []
for path in files:
match = re.match(r"(\d{4})-", path.name)
if not match:
continue
adr = f"ADR-{match.group(1)}"
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if adr not in index:
errors.append(f"ADR omitted from index: {path}")
if not re.search(r"(?mi)^Status:\s*(Accepted|Proposed|Superseded|Deprecated)\b", text):
errors.append(f"ADR missing recognized Status field: {path}")
print(f"indexed_adr_files={len(files)}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
sys.exit(1)
print("adr_index_and_statuses=PASS")
PY
echo "== Documentation contract-test terms =="
for f in tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py \
tests/test_automation_historical_loop_supersession_contract.py \
tests/test_automation_doctoring_index_contract.py; do
echo "--- $f"
test -f "$f"
rg -n -i \
'implemented_on_protected_main|active_pr|accepted_architecture|planned|research_only|superseded|out_of_scope|ADR-000[24789]|Mermaid|local link|live.base|source_revision|merge_revision|conceptual|persist|COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN|central|leaf|USER_REDIRECTION_INCIDENT|no.soft.timeout|two fresh|Strix|cancel-in-progress' \
"$f" | head -n 240
done
echo "== Markdown fence, Mermaid, and local-link integrity =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re, sys
root = Path.cwd()
errors = []
mermaid = 0
for path in sorted((root / "docs").rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
mermaid += len(re.findall(r"^```mermaid\s*$", text, re.M))
for raw in re.findall(r"(?<!!)\[[^\]]+\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+\"[^\"]*\")?\)", text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith(("mailto:", "#")):
continue
if not (path.parent / target).resolve().exists():
errors.append(f"missing local target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
print(f"mermaid_fences={mermaid}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
sys.exit(1)
print("markdown_integrity=PASS")
PY
echo "== Required indexed-document files =="
for f in \
docs/automation/PRD.md \
docs/automation/TRD.md \
docs/automation/EVENT_CONTRACTS.md \
docs/automation/ARCHITECTURE.md \
docs/automation/UML.md \
docs/automation/DATA_MODEL.md \
docs/automation/ERD.md \
docs/automation/SECURITY.md \
docs/automation/THREAT_MODEL.md \
docs/automation/AUTONOMY_THREATS.md \
docs/automation/TEST_STRATEGY.md \
docs/automation/OPERABILITY.md \
docs/automation/INCIDENT_RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/CONTINUATION_RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/TRACEABILITY.md \
docs/automation/DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT.md \
docs/automation/adr/README.md \
docs/doctoring/automation-control-plane-standards.md; do
test -s "$f" && echo "PRESENT $f" || { echo "MISSING $f"; exit 1; }
doneLength of output: 8213
I found no source-backed actionable defect in the requested scope. Verified items:
This review evaluates the documentation graph as
|
|
Exact-current-head independent review request for Review the full 56-file authoritative automation-control-plane documentation graph and its permanent documentation-as-code gate. The baseline explicitly distinguishes protected-main implementation, active PR, accepted architecture, planned, research-only, superseded, and out-of-scope maturity; keeps central control-plane ownership separate from leaf product semantics; formalizes continuation after user-reported premature stops; indexes PRD/TRD, event contracts, architecture, UML, conceptual/logical ERD, data model, security/threat models, test strategy, operability/runbooks, traceability, documentation audit, standards doctoring, and 16 ADRs; and aligns AGENTS/CLAUDE/README/ARCHITECTURE/CHANGELOG. The sole OpenCode finding about the Strix concurrency comment was disproven against authoritative base/head source: both already use event-class grouping, PR-number grouping for Keep the exact head unchanged. Do not promote active/planned work into shipped truth, duplicate leaf PRDs centrally, invent a deployed database or certification claim, synthesize author approval, weaken the continuation or documentation-fitness contracts, update the branch, merge, release, or bypass protection. After protected integration, refetch protected @coderabbitai review |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/.github"
pr="896"
head_sha="26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b"
base_sha="6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba"
echo "== Exact revision identity =="
actual="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
printf 'checked_out=%s\nexpected_head=%s\nmatch=%s\n' \
"$actual" "$head_sha" "$(test "$actual" = "$head_sha" && echo yes || echo no)"
printf 'base_object='; git cat-file -t "$base_sha"
echo "== PR state and exact identities =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" \
--json state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision \
--jq '{state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision}'
echo "== Exact-head checks not completed successfully =="
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head_sha/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion,details_url}]'
echo "== Exact-head check-run names and conclusions =="
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head_sha/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion}] | sort_by(.name)'
echo "== Current reviews =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json reviews \
--jq '[.reviews[] | {author:.author.login,state,commit:.commit.oid,submittedAt}]'
echo "== Unresolved review-thread count =="
gh api graphql -F owner="ContextualWisdomLab" -F name=".github" -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
pullRequest(number:$number) {
reviewThreads(first:100) { nodes { isResolved } }
}
}
}' --jq '[.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false)] | length'
echo "== Changed files =="
git diff --name-only "$base_sha" "$head_sha" | sort
echo "== Required documentation paths and ADR count =="
for f in \
docs/automation/README.md docs/automation/PRD.md docs/automation/TRD.md \
docs/automation/EVENT_CONTRACTS.md docs/automation/ARCHITECTURE.md \
docs/automation/UML.md docs/automation/ERD.md docs/automation/DATA_MODEL.md \
docs/automation/SECURITY.md docs/automation/THREAT_MODEL.md \
docs/automation/AUTONOMY_THREATS.md docs/automation/TEST_STRATEGY.md \
docs/automation/OPERABILITY.md docs/automation/INCIDENT_RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/RUNBOOK.md docs/automation/CONTINUATION_RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/TRACEABILITY.md docs/automation/DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT.md \
docs/doctoring/automation-control-plane-standards.md \
tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py \
.github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml; do
test -s "$f" && echo "PRESENT $f" || { echo "MISSING $f"; exit 1; }
done
printf 'adr_files='
fd -t f -e md . docs/automation/adr | rg '/[0-9]{4}-.*\.md$' | wc -l
echo "== Required semantic contract evidence =="
rg -n -i -C 1 \
'implemented_on_protected_main|active_pr|accepted_architecture|planned|research_only|superseded|out_of_scope|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|same.invocation|no.soft.timeout|two.*fresh|double.*(exit|sweep)|central.*owner|leaf.*owner|conceptual|deployed database|source_revision|live.base|merge_revision|COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN|ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018|ISO/IEC 25010:2023' \
docs/automation docs/doctoring tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py \
| head -n 1000
echo "== Strix executable concurrency: base/head =="
fd -t f . .github/workflows | rg -i 'strix' | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f base"
git show "$base_sha:$f" | rg -n -C 4 'concurrency:|group:|cancel-in-progress:' || true
echo "--- $f head"
git show "$head_sha:$f" | rg -n -C 4 'concurrency:|group:|cancel-in-progress:' || true
done
echo "== Documentation workflow exact-revision and quality-gate evidence =="
rg -n -C 2 'github\.sha|pull_request\.head\.sha|checkout|pytest|coverage|fail-under|compile' \
.github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml
echo "== Static Markdown fence/local-link/Mermaid integrity =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re, sys
root = Path.cwd()
errors = []
mermaid = 0
for path in sorted((root / "docs").rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
mermaid += len(re.findall(r"^```mermaid\s*$", text, re.M))
for raw in re.findall(r'(?<!!)\[[^\]]+\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+"[^"]*")?\)', text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith(("mailto:", "#")):
continue
if not (path.parent / target).resolve().exists():
errors.append(f"missing local target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
print(f"mermaid_fences={mermaid}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
sys.exit(1)
print("markdown_integrity=PASS")
PYLength of output: 139581
I found no source-backed actionable defect in the requested scope. Verified results:
I used the retrieved evidence-authority guidance. Exact-head checks, formal reviews, unresolved threads, and merge authority remain separate evidence classes. The current GitHub state still reports 🧠 Learnings used
|
|
Exact-current-head review request for All eleven directly observed exact-head workflows are terminal-success, the complete documentation-quality gate reports 1,004 tests plus 16 subtests with 100% owned production statement/branch coverage, and the only inline thread is resolved. The dismissed OpenCode finding asserted nonexistent comment/code drift; exact base and head both already use event-class/PR-number grouping with Review the unchanged exact head and the canonical PRD/TRD/Architecture/UML/ERD/Data Model/Security/Threat Model/Test Strategy/Operability/ADR/Traceability graph. Submit a current-head verdict only. Do not update the branch, promote active/planned work to shipped truth, synthesize author approval, or bypass protection. @coderabbitai review |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/.github"
pr="896"
head_sha="26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b"
base_sha="6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba"
echo "== Revision identity =="
actual="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
printf 'checked_out=%s\nexpected_head=%s\nhead_match=%s\n' \
"$actual" "$head_sha" "$(test "$actual" = "$head_sha" && echo yes || echo no)"
printf 'base_object='
git cat-file -t "$base_sha"
echo "== Pull request and exact-head checks =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" \
--json state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision \
--jq '{state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,mergeable,reviewDecision}'
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head_sha/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | select(.status != "completed" or (.conclusion != "success" and .conclusion != "neutral" and .conclusion != "skipped")) | {name,status,conclusion,details_url}]'
echo "== Current unresolved review threads =="
gh api graphql -F owner="ContextualWisdomLab" -F name=".github" -F number="$pr" -f query='
query($owner:String!, $name:String!, $number:Int!) {
repository(owner:$owner,name:$name) {
pullRequest(number:$number) {
reviewThreads(first:100) { nodes { isResolved } }
}
}
}' --jq '[.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false)] | length'
echo "== Required documentation graph paths =="
for f in \
docs/automation/README.md docs/automation/PRD.md docs/automation/TRD.md \
docs/automation/EVENT_CONTRACTS.md docs/automation/ARCHITECTURE.md \
docs/automation/UML.md docs/automation/ERD.md docs/automation/DATA_MODEL.md \
docs/automation/SECURITY.md docs/automation/THREAT_MODEL.md \
docs/automation/AUTONOMY_THREATS.md docs/automation/TEST_STRATEGY.md \
docs/automation/OPERABILITY.md docs/automation/INCIDENT_RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/RUNBOOK.md docs/automation/CONTINUATION_RUNBOOK.md \
docs/automation/TRACEABILITY.md docs/automation/DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT.md \
docs/automation/adr/README.md docs/doctoring/automation-control-plane-standards.md \
tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py \
.github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml; do
test -s "$f" && echo "PRESENT $f" || { echo "MISSING $f"; exit 1; }
done
printf 'adr_files='
fd -t f -e md . docs/automation/adr | rg '/[0-9]{4}-.*\.md$' | wc -l
echo "== Required semantic controls =="
rg -n -i -C 1 \
'implemented_on_protected_main|active_pr|accepted_architecture|planned|research_only|superseded|out_of_scope|remediation_candidate|continuation_handoff|documentation_artifact|traceability_record|same.invocation|no.soft.timeout|two.*fresh|double.*(exit|sweep)|central.*own|leaf.*own|conceptual|deployed database|source_revision|live.base|merge_revision|COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN|ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018|ISO/IEC 25010:2023' \
docs/automation docs/doctoring tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py \
| head -n 1200
echo "== Documentation contract test map =="
ast-grep outline tests/test_automation_documentation_contract.py --items all --view expanded
echo "== Strix base/head executable concurrency and diff =="
fd -t f . .github/workflows | rg -i 'strix' | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f base"
git show "$base_sha:$f" | rg -n -C 5 'concurrency:|group:|cancel-in-progress:' || true
echo "--- $f head"
git show "$head_sha:$f" | rg -n -C 5 'concurrency:|group:|cancel-in-progress:' || true
echo "--- diff"
git diff --unified=8 "$base_sha" "$head_sha" -- "$f"
done
echo "== Documentation CI exact-revision and quality gates =="
rg -n -C 2 'github\.sha|pull_request\.head\.sha|checkout|pytest|coverage|fail-under|compile' \
.github/workflows/automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml
echo "== Markdown local links, fences, and Mermaid fences =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re, sys
root = Path.cwd()
errors = []
mermaid = 0
for path in sorted((root / "docs").rglob("*.md")):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
if text.count("```") % 2:
errors.append(f"unbalanced fence: {path.relative_to(root)}")
mermaid += len(re.findall(r"^```mermaid\s*$", text, re.M))
for raw in re.findall(r'(?<!!)\[[^\]]+\]\(([^)\s]+)(?:\s+"[^"]*")?\)', text):
target = raw.split("#", 1)[0]
if not target or "://" in target or target.startswith(("mailto:", "#")):
continue
if not (path.parent / target).resolve().exists():
errors.append(f"missing local target: {path.relative_to(root)} -> {raw}")
print(f"mermaid_fences={mermaid}")
if errors:
print("\n".join(errors))
sys.exit(1)
print("markdown_integrity=PASS")
PYLength of output: 139946
I found no source-backed actionable defect in the requested scope. Verified results:
I used the retrieved evidence-authority guidance. Exact-head checks, formal approval, unresolved-thread state, and merge authority remain separate evidence classes. GitHub still reports 🧠 Learnings used
|
|
@opencode-agent review Re-evaluate exact current head |
Replay unique #896 source onto current origin/main. Skip stale materialize trees and keep current governance/audit bodies except for the required unique index pointers.
a7fbb22 to
d289615
Compare
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES
Exact head d289615f vs live base c47afc2d is a documentation graph, not shipped runtime. The new quality workflow is exact-head, hash-pinned, and contents: read only. Local links and fences under docs/automation resolve. The old Strix concurrency-comment finding is not in this diff.
The graph still names closed-unmerged pull requests as active_pr integration paths. DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT.md defines active_pr as an open pull request. Contract tests hard-code those dead locators, so CI stays green while the live GitHub authority is wrong.
Blocking
- Redaction path is dead. #906 is
closed,merged=false(2026-08-12). TRACEABILITY, TM-01, ADR-0009, and the contract test still call it the Draftactive_prsuccessor. Live open tip is #1031. Do not merge overlapping #929 in parallel. - Dispatch envelope path is dead. #840 is
closed,merged=false(2026-08-16). IG-001 / TM-03 / the contract tuple still point at it. Live bounded successor is Draft #1021.
Body hygiene (not a committed file)
The PR body still cites base 6eb06cdd and head a7fbb22f, and says the PR is mechanically mergeable. Live API: base c47afc2d, head d289615f, mergeable_state=blocked. Predecessor-head check counts are not current-head evidence.
Next action
Do not merge this head. Absorb the live-object retarget from #1035 (c9df8f76) or close this PR as superseded by that successor after verifying no unique accepted decision was dropped. Then regenerate exact-head documentation, security, and review evidence on the surviving line.
CodeRabbit CLI 0.7.3 is installed here but coderabbit auth status --agent is unauthenticated; GitHub CodeRabbit on this synchronize is rate-limited. This verdict is from live GitHub objects plus the committed graph.
Sent by Cursor Automation: Fix Issues
| - `ContextualWisdomLab/.github#841` is closed/unmerged historical origin evidence. It established the disclosure concern but mixed unrelated scope; it is `superseded` as an integration path. | ||
| - `ContextualWisdomLab/.github#842` is closed/unmerged historical RED→GREEN and exhaustive-boundary evidence. Its final blobs removed current-source defects but its reachable PR history retained secret-shaped test fixtures that kept Secret Scan red; it is `superseded` as an integration path. | ||
| - `ContextualWisdomLab/.github#888` is closed/unmerged `superseded` incident evidence. It initially replayed the final ten #842 blobs without predecessor fixture history, but a later committed credential-shaped fixture made its reachable range fail Secret Scan again. | ||
| - `ContextualWisdomLab/.github#906` is the Draft `active_pr` clean-history successor from protected main. It carries the corrected final ten blobs and includes the direct Docker/Podman login repair; bounded wrapper recursion is tracked by [Issue #907](https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/issues/907), while atomic multiline/duplicate-key JSON redaction is tracked by [Issue #908](https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/issues/908). Its exact-head checks, reviews, and threads must be re-fetched at every decision; predecessor or queued evidence is non-authorizing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ContextualWisdomLab/.github#906 is closed unmerged (closed_at=2026-08-12T05:35:33Z). Calling it the Draft active_pr clean-history successor contradicts DOCUMENTATION_AUDIT.md (active_pr requires an open PR) and sends operators to a dead integration path.
Retarget this row to open #1035's lineage: mark #906 superseded and name open #1031 as the current redaction successor. Keep #929 as an overlapping predecessor that must not merge in parallel.
|
|
||
| | Gap | Live object | Current boundary and required closure | Maturity | | ||
| |---|---|---|---| | ||
| | `IG-001` dispatch snapshot preservation | [PR #840](https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/pull/840) | The active PR proposes an end-to-end versioned envelope, live-base binding, and review-only route; protected-main consumer acceptance remains required. | `active_pr` | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
|
||
| | Threat | Exact control source | Exact regression evidence | Closure boundary | Current maturity | | ||
| |---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| | TM-01 | `scripts/ci/redact_sensitive_log.py`; `scripts/ci/sandboxed_verify.py`; `scripts/ci/sandboxed_web_e2e.py` | `tests/test_sandboxed_verify.py`; `tests/test_sandboxed_web_e2e.py`; `tests/test_opencode_security_boundaries.py` | [PR #888](https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/pull/888) is closed unmerged as `superseded` incident evidence after reachable-history re-contamination; clean-history integration and consumer proof are proposed by Draft [PR #906](https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/pull/906). | `active_pr` | |
|
|
||
| traceability = read_document("TRACEABILITY.md") | ||
| assert "#888` is closed/unmerged `superseded`" in traceability | ||
| assert "#906` is the Draft `active_pr`" in traceability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This assertion freezes the dead Draft as current truth (#906 is the Draft active_pr). The suite then stays green while live GitHub has moved.
Bind the contract to the live locators: #906 closed/unmerged superseded, #1031 current open active_pr, and IG-001 → #1021. #1035 already contains that retarget.
Execute the isolated pytest-asyncio import after the hash-lock install and collect a marked buyer-style coroutine. Keep root AGENTS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and CLAUDE.md on #896. Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
d289615f8f33783b1011ef8cd93de47a5a96d6df. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Strix Security Scan/strix: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/31955949047/job/95186501735)
- Strix Security Scan/strix: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/31955949047/job/95186501735)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow: automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (6 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs (42 files)"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Docs (42 files)"]
R3 --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (3 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test (3 files)"]
R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
d289615f8f33783b1011ef8cd93de47a5a96d6df. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Strix Security Scan/strix: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/31955949047/job/95186501735)
- Strix Security Scan/strix: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/31955949047/job/95186501735)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: automation-documentation-quality-ci.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (6 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs (42 files)"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (3 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V4["targeted test run"]
1 participant
Outcome
Protected
maindid not yet provide a sufficient durable source of truth for the organization automation control plane: product requirements, technical interfaces, evidence authorities, logical data relationships, operations, security, standards, whole-conversation ownership, and autonomous continuation semantics were fragmented across workflows, rollout ledgers, PR bodies, incident notes, prompts, and planning material.This PR establishes one authoritative indexed documentation graph, separates shipped/proposed/planned maturity, and turns remaining runtime/product drift into traceable implementation debt rather than hiding it behind document existence.
Exact identity and scope repair
main@6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba;26c7a8c4a6a7f593e1cbbb88f66fb2a604f8309b;a7fbb22f3f04440cf9a604cd5816c43dd69cf386;After the bounded documentation baseline, unrelated central architecture/materializer commits entered this branch. A non-destructive forward commit now points to the exact previously bounded tree. GitHub compare reports zero changed files between
26c7a8c...and the current head. No force-push, rebase, history rewrite, predecessor evidence transfer, or gate weakening was used.Every earlier check, review, approval, or synthetic merge result is historical only. Current-head evidence must regenerate.
Canonical scope
implemented_on_protected_main,active_pr,accepted_architecture,planned,research_only,superseded,out_of_scope;Premature-stop incident contract
A user-reported early stop is
USER_REDIRECTION_INCIDENT:ADR-0007, the continuation runbook, UML, documentation audit, traceability, and permanent regressions carry the same contract.
Documentation fitness
For central automation/control-plane scope, the active-PR graph covers PRD, TRD/event contracts, Architecture, UML, conceptual ERD/Data Model, Security/Threat Model, Test Strategy, Operability/Runbooks, ADRs, Traceability, Documentation Audit, and standards authority coherently enough to review and machine-check.
This does not promote active PRs, planned gaps, releases, or protected-main acceptance into shipped truth. Product-specific PRDs/data models remain in their owning repositories.
Verification posture
The previously bounded tree completed all 11 pull-request workflows, including Automation Documentation Quality CI with
1004 passed,6978/6978statements and2790/2790branches, followed by successful compilation and security/supply-chain gates. Those results prove the predecessor head only.The current head must regenerate every applicable exact-head quality, security, supply-chain, and semantic-review result. Pending, queued, skipped, cancelled, absent, stale, predecessor-head, local-only, author-only, status-only, synthetic, or model-only evidence is not acceptance.
Remaining implementation debt
Documentation adequacy is not runtime completion. Active/planned items include scheduler terminal-gap repair, reusable Cloudflare Pages secret/input safety, bounded SLI receipts, integrated atomic redaction, explicit runtime dispatch/result schema adoption, sandbox output/service-file quotas, and protected-main/real-consumer operational acceptance. No durable cross-repository writer/continuation database is claimed; persistence requires a separate ADR, privacy/tenancy model, and DR contract.
Merge authority and rollback
Merge or auto-merge only after the unchanged current head has terminal-success required gates, zero valid unresolved findings, a qualifying current-head semantic verdict, two qualifying independent non-author approvals including approval after the latest push, compatible live-base evidence, and ordinary expected-head branch-protection authorization. After protected merge, refetch the canonical index from protected
mainbefore changing maturity toimplemented_on_protected_main. Rollback is a normal protected revert. No self-approval, administrative bypass, synthetic approval, or protection weakening is requested.