Skip to content

feat(automation): run psychometrics-commons hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair - #1092

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/psychometrics-commons-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair
Open

feat(automation): run psychometrics-commons hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair#1092
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/psychometrics-commons-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

A buyer of hosted psychometric assessment would feel live ContextualWisdomLab/psychometrics-commons heads stalling while hourly NVIDIA NIM review-repair only scanned Clearfolio, DiskSage, and fast-mlsirm. This increment adds a thin minute-9 caller that names the exact repository and protected main, dispatches at most one exact-head repair, and keeps the product-neutral scheduler free of product literals.

Live heads that never entered the older callers include ContextualWisdomLab/psychometrics-commons#244, ContextualWisdomLab/psychometrics-commons#242, ContextualWisdomLab/psychometrics-commons#240, and ContextualWisdomLab/psychometrics-commons#237.

Contract

  • Cron 9 * * * *, cancel-in-progress: false, max_dispatches: 1, retry_hours: 2
  • Workflow token contents: read; job-scoped id-token: write
  • Maps only PR_REVIEW_MERGE_TOKEN and OPENCODE_APPROVE_TOKEN
  • Does not receive NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY or COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN
  • Does not hard-code the product into pr-review-fix-scheduler.yml
  • Scientific/measurement gates and operational participant evidence stay unmasked

Test plan

  • Local coverage run -m pytest tests && coverage report --show-missing twice (1122 passed, 100%)
  • Local interrogate twice (100%)
  • Focused caller/doctoring/path-filter contracts
  • GitHub required checks on the new head (do not wait on Strix)
  • Arm squash auto-merge; do not self-approve

…repair

Add a thin minute-9 caller so hosted measurement pull requests receive the
same exact-head RCA repair heartbeat as other CWL products without copying
scheduler, model, or credential logic.
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 46 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6406a17d-d164-4797-8e73-fdf5e2db11e3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c47afc2 and 4648bb6.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/workflows/hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair.yml
  • .github/workflows/psychometrics-commons-hourly-review-repair.yml
  • AGENTS.md
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • docs/doctoring/psychometrics-commons-hourly-review-caller.md
  • tests/test_psychometrics_commons_hourly_review_caller.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 4648bb69f01b9bb3882fdfd931e49d80b94e1791.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Workflow (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Changed file (4 files)"]
  S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
  R2 --> V2["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S3["Docs: psychometrics-commons-hourly-review-caller.md"]
  S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
  I3 --> R3["Review risk: Docs: psychometrics-commons-hourly-review-caller.md"]
  R3 --> V3["docs review"]
  Evidence --> S4["Test: test_psychometrics_commons_hourly_review_caller.py"]
  S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
  I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test: test_psychometrics_commons_hourly_review_caller.py"]
  R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 4648bb69f01b9bb3882fdfd931e49d80b94e1791
  • Workflow run: 32012626030
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 4648bb69f01b9bb3882fdfd931e49d80b94e1791.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Workflow (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Changed file (4 files)"]
  S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
  R2 --> V2["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S3["Docs: psychometrics-commons-hourly-review-caller.md"]
  S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
  I3 --> R3["Review risk: Docs: psychometrics-commons-hourly-review-caller.md"]
  R3 --> V3["docs review"]
  Evidence --> S4["Test: test_psychometrics_commons_hourly_review_caller.py"]
  S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
  I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test: test_psychometrics_commons_hourly_review_caller.py"]
  R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
Loading

@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 10:12
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 11:05
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 11:05
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 11:06
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 11:06
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 11:15
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 11:19
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 12:22
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 12:27
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 12:29
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 12:31
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 12:34
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 17, 2026 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant