feat(automation): run Appguardrail hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair - #1079
feat(automation): run Appguardrail hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair#1079seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Add a thin minute-41 caller for ContextualWisdomLab/appguardrail against protected develop so live SAST and assurance heads receive the same bounded NVIDIA NIM repair already used by Clearfolio, DiskSage, and fast-mlsirm. The caller stays read-only, maps only established scheduler tokens, and never receives NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY or COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN.
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 39 minutes Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Buyer-perceivable gap
A paying buyer of appguardrail (SAST / assurance / Strix-finding collector) would feel live pull requests targeting protected
developnever receiving hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair. Existing heartbeats scan Clearfolio, DiskSage, and fast-mlsirm againstmain. Live heads such as ContextualWisdomLab/appguardrail#964, ContextualWisdomLab/appguardrail#967, ContextualWisdomLab/appguardrail#970, and ContextualWisdomLab/appguardrail#971 never enter those callers.What this PR does
ContextualWisdomLab/appguardrailwithbase_branch: develop.contents: read; job-scopedid-token: writefor OIDC. Maps onlyPR_REVIEW_MERGE_TOKENandOPENCODE_APPROVE_TOKEN.NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEYand never introducesCOPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN. Model execution stays in the central worker.Verification
Local 2×
coverage run -m pytest tests && coverage report --show-missingplusinterrogate: 1122 passed, coverage 100%, interrogate 100%.Closes no issue. GitHub Project #1 is the live tracker.