Skip to content
ColomboAI-comPublic

About

Governed empirical evaluation, calibration, and provider qualification for C3R

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

25 Commits

Folders and files

Repository files navigation

c3r-evals

Evidence tooling for C3R: Robust Calibrated Compute Control. This repository turns governed traces into reproducible splits, calibration reports, and provider-qualification evidence without storing prompts, responses, or secrets.

Guarantees

  • every record carries source, license, consent, collection-time, and content hashes;
  • deterministic group-aware train/validation/calibration/test splits;
  • exact and normalized-content contamination checks fail closed;
  • Brier, NLL, ECE, MCE, accuracy, coverage, and selective-risk reports;
  • provider probes are bounded and emit redacted, hash-addressed evidence.

This is evaluation infrastructure, not a claim that C3R is empirically qualified. Published artifacts must include their manifest and pass python -m unittest.

Laya source admission

The Laya-associated typed-decisions dataset is pinned in sources/laya-typed-decisions-train.json at revision c76749ec58bd8c3d2ea706b31c333a9059c38f90. Its public card describes synthetic scenarios and teacher labels. It may seed an attributed synthetic training or benchmark slice; it is not observed C3R task-outcome data. The upstream test split is sealed from training and C3R calibration. DeepSeek-generated proposals likewise remain model-generated until independently adjudicated.

Run the fail-closed preflight before ingesting or releasing a source:

python scripts/check_source.py sources/laya-typed-decisions-train.json --use training --claim synthetic

The check rejects synthetic-to-empirical promotion, synthetic release calibration, test-split contamination, and mutable or incomplete source declarations. It does not independently verify the stated rights, consent, file hashes, or outcomes; those require a separate provenance review. A passing source check alone can never authorize a production claim.

The pinned public train Parquet file was audited with scripts/audit_laya_train.py and optional pyarrow support (pip install '.[parquet]'). Its SHA-256 matches the registry, all 1,200 rows declare train, and 1,200 distinct synthetic states were found across four workflows. The aggregate-only sources/laya-typed-decisions-train.audit.json records the counts and question types; no raw rows were committed. Reproduce with:

python scripts/audit_laya_train.py /path/to/all/train-00000-of-00001.parquet \
  --source sources/laya-typed-decisions-train.json \
  --output sources/laya-typed-decisions-train.audit.json

Paired evaluation contract

scripts/report_paired.py consumes redacted JSONL observations with one baseline and one c3r arm per task. Both arms must have the same state hash; each must carry a unique trace hash, an independent outcome-label reference, an explicit outcome kind, measured latency/cost, and an authority-bypass flag. Missing arms, mismatched states, duplicate traces, and invalid measurements fail closed. The report is descriptive, not a production qualification or a substitute for inspecting the underlying outcome labels. It requires a non-synthetic source policy, so the Laya train manifest cannot be used to produce an empirical paired report.

The first controlled report covers five C3R-authored local fixtures. Its positive label is policy-rubric match, not task success; timing is a single-run smoke observation. No trained model, provider, customer traffic, or live Colibri route is included. The pinned redacted raw observations and rubric generator are in the C3R draft branch.

Quick start

python -m unittest discover -s tests
python scripts/qualify_openrouter.py --model MODEL_ID --output evidence.json

The provider probe requires OPENROUTER_API_KEY. It sends one fixed, non-sensitive prompt with a hard cap of 256 generated tokens and never writes response content. Reasoning-only output is not counted as a completed response. The redacted evidence files cover one DeepSeek, one Qwen, and one frontier-model OpenRouter call, plus a private self-hosted DeepSeek serving-budget observation. They are protocol smoke tests, not end-to-end C3R qualification or evidence of comparative task success.

About

Governed empirical evaluation, calibration, and provider qualification for C3R

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages