Add checkbox to hide Merged/Done issues in Open Items

[bkraeling]

Summary

• The Open Items list can show Linear issues with a "Merged" workflow state (it's a started-type state, so it still passes the open-issue query filter) even though the PR has already landed, plus occasionally "Done" issues that haven't fully synced out of the query yet.
• Adds a "Hide Merged/Done" checkbox above the list that filters those cards out client-side.
• Fetches state { name } on each Linear issue so the card can carry its status, then hides matching cards via a pure-CSS sibling-selector toggle — no <script>, since this partial is injected via fetch + innerHTML on the index page, which wouldn't execute a script tag anyway.

Test plan

• pytest full suite passes (194 passed)
• Rendered the partial with sample Merged/Done/In-Progress issues and verified in browser: unchecked shows all issues, checking "Hide Merged/Done" hides Merged and Done cards in both the Priority and Non-priority sections, unchecking restores them

📸 Screenshots (demo data)

This sandbox has no LINEAR_API_KEY/GITHUB_TOKEN, so these are captured against the
real Flask app / real Jinja templates / real CSS, with get_open_issues stubbed to
return a handful of synthetic Linear issues (including Merged/Done ones) so the new
checkbox has something to filter. Everything downstream of that data — routing,
rendering, the checkbox and CSS filter under test — is untouched. Headless Playwright
run, assertions in-line (all passed).

Filter off — Merged/Done issues show:

Desktop	Mobile

Filter on — Merged/Done issues hidden:

Desktop	Mobile

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds a client-side “Hide Merged/Done” toggle to the Open Items partial so that Linear issues lingering in “Merged” (started-type) or occasionally “Done” can be hidden without changing the server-side open-issue query behavior.

Changes:

• Added a checkbox + CSS sibling-selector rule to hide cards with data-status of Merged/Done in the Open Items partial.
• Annotated each rendered issue card with the Linear workflow state name (data-status=...).
• Extended the Linear get_open_issues GraphQL selection set to fetch state { name }.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
templates/partials/index_open_items.html	Adds the checkbox UI, sets per-card data-status, and applies CSS-only filtering for Merged/Done cards.
linear/issues.py	Fetches Linear issue state name so the template can render status-driven filtering.

Suppressed comments (1)

templates/partials/index_open_items.html:28

• Same as above: prefer default('', true) for data-status to avoid relying on the truthiness of issue.state and to keep the attribute empty when state.name is missing.

    <div class="card" data-status="{{ issue.state.name if issue.state else '' }}">

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[mary-pr-poppins]

💬 Mary PR Poppins — Comment

⚪ 2 notes

Client-side Hide Merged/Done toggle on Open Items, with state { name } on the Linear query and a CSS sibling-selector filter. I'd approve on the merits, but automated approval is blocked by no Linear issue and no test coverage for the new filter — suggest a Bug Board maintainer attach a Linear issue and sign off.

Worth your attention

1. ⚪ [Completeness & Correctness] [linear] ApollosProject PR has no Linear issue reference — templates/partials/index_open_items.html:2
2. ⚪ [Completeness & Correctness] [tests] Hide Merged/Done has no automated coverage — templates/partials/index_open_items.html:2

Notes · 2

⚪ [Completeness & Correctness] [linear] ApollosProject PR has no Linear issue reference — templates/partials/index_open_items.html:2
Title, body, and commits have no ENG-/APO-/CS- key or linear.app URL, so acceptance criteria cannot be checked. Link a Linear issue if this is tracked work.

---

⚪ [Completeness & Correctness] [tests] Hide Merged/Done has no automated coverage — templates/partials/index_open_items.html:2
The checkbox, data-status, CSS hide rules, and state { name } on linear/issues.py:46 are untested; tests/test_linear_issue_state_filters.py:103 still passes if this feature is reverted. A render_template test plus an assert that the open-issues query selects state { name } would lock it in.

✅ Mary would approve this on the merits, but can't approve it automatically — test coverage isn't complete at the levels this change needs; no Linear issue is referenced. A second set of eyes should review and approve.