Skip to content

docs: align benchmark speed summary with table (1k serpentine within noise) - #169

Open
loom-fleet-dispatch[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/issue-167
Open

loom-fleet-dispatch[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/issue-167

Conversation

@loom-fleet-dispatch

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • docs/benchmarks.md Speed summary no longer claims a win on every completed deck: it now notes the 1 000-filament serpentine (73 ms vs 69 ms) is within noise.
  • Narrowed '3× at small sizes' to the measured 1.6–3× (48 filaments 31→10 ms, ~250 filaments 21→13 ms), and added ~2.2× at 5 k (4.52→2.06 s) for continuity.
  • README.md repeated the claim ('faster ... at every size up to ~20 000 filaments (3× at small sizes ...)'); applied the same correction there.

Docs-only; no code or tests touched.

Closes #167

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

loom dashboard

…noise)

The Speed summary claimed the dense path beats FastHenry on every completed
deck, but the 1,000-filament serpentine row is 73 ms vs 69 ms. Note the
exception, and narrow '3x at small sizes' to the measured 1.6-3x. Apply the
same correction to the README sentence that repeats the summary.

Closes #167

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Loom-Story: #167
Loom-Trace-Id: cb75ef33a6890b540ff1f237362bd3c4
Loom-Build: 0.19.868 ee904e1c151bc9cf15b0eb55dfe9d57ad6136cff clean
@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:review-requested PR ready for Judge to review. Applied by: Builder when opening PR. loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: code review of 466cdad is clean (docs-only; figures match the benchmark table, Closes #167 present) and all 7 checks show pass in gh pr checks. However post-verdict.sh's exact-head CI gate refuses the approval because wait-checks cannot read required contexts on main ("Resource not accessible by integration"). Not overriding the gate. Releasing the claim and leaving loom:review-requested for a later pass or an operator.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: code review passed for 466cdad, but approval could not be posted.

README.md and docs/benchmarks.md match #167 and the published table. Arithmetic over its rows gives speed ratios 3.100×, 1.615×, 0.945×, 2.194×, and 1.243×. Benchmark timing and variance were not independently rerun; 'within noise' is the operator's characterization. git diff --check origin/main...HEAD passed, and the branch is current with main (git rev-list --left-right --count origin/main...HEAD: 0 1). The README benchmark link exists. Paginated changed-file enumeration contains only these two Markdown files, so local Rust tests were not rerun. No Test Plan or TDD line is present; this is advisory for documentation.

gh pr checks 169 reports all seven checks passing; check-review-feedback.sh reports CLEAR with zero formal reviews or inline comments. However, post-verdict.sh refused approval with exit 5 because the installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks. No approval was posted and no loom:pr label was applied. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a later pass after the daemon is updated.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: code/doc review passed (figures in README.md and docs/benchmarks.md match the Speed table; all visible CI checks green on 466cdad, merge state CLEAN). Not approving yet: post-verdict.sh's exact-head CI gate could not read the required-check contexts (gh api graphql ... Resource not accessible by integration, wait-checks reports required-contexts-unknown), so it refuses the approval. Releasing the claim and leaving loom:review-requested; this needs the worker's token to be able to read branch protection, or an operator-side approval.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed for 466cdad: the two documentation changes match the benchmark table and #167; diff whitespace and merge-preview checks passed. gh pr checks reported seven passing checks, and check-review-feedback.sh reported CLEAR with no formal reviews or inline comments. Benchmark variability was not independently remeasured; the within-noise characterization comes from the operator in #167. No runtime tests were run for the prose-only diff. Approval remains pending: post-verdict.sh refused with exit 5 because the installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks, so its mandatory exact-head CI gate could not run. No approval was posted. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested; update loom-daemon to a compatible version before re-running Judge.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge pass: still carries a fresh loom:reviewing claim (claimed 2026-10-08T09:41:17Z, idle 0m) — standing down without reclaiming. Not stomping.

Stand-down passes against this claim: 1 of 3 before the bounded fallback force-reclaims it. This comment is edited in place on each pass rather than reposted (#5123, #6514).

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge evaluation complete at 466cdad: the documentation correction matches issue #167 and the benchmark table (31/10=3.1, 21/13=1.62, 4.52/2.06=2.19, 103.7/83.4=1.24). git diff --check passes; gh pr checks reports all seven checks passing; formal/inline feedback gate reports CLEAR with zero reviews/comments. No local functional tests apply to the two Markdown-only changes; timings/noise were not independently rerun. No Test Plan or TDD line is present (advisory for docs). Approval could not be posted: post-verdict.sh refused with exit 5 because installed loom-daemon 0.19.624 lacks forge wait-checks; the gate requires >=0.19.707. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for re-evaluation after the daemon is updated.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: review of the content is complete and clean (figures in README.md / docs/benchmarks.md match the Speed table: 3.1×, 1.6×, 2.19×, 1.24×; 1k serpentine 69 vs 73 ms; no formal reviews outstanding; all 7 checks pass per gh pr checks). I could not issue the approval because post-verdict.sh's exact-head CI gate (#10485) refused it: forge wait-checks returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown) — required-context lookup for main failed: ... gh: Resource not accessible by integration (the worker's token cannot read branch protection). Releasing the claim and leaving loom:review-requested in place; this needs the token's branch-protection read access fixed (or an operator approval), not a code change.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code/documentation review passed at 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116; approval remains gated on CI verification.

  • Reviewed the full diff and the Speed table in docs/benchmarks.md. Calculated ratios: 31/10 = 3.1, 21/13 = 1.615, 4.52/2.06 = 2.194, and 103.7/83.4 = 1.243, consistent with the revised rounded summaries. Both documents now acknowledge the 73 ms versus 69 ms exception requested in benchmarks.md summary contradicts its own 1,000-filament row #167. The noise characterization comes from the linked issue; benchmark variability was not independently remeasured.
  • git diff origin/main...HEAD --check passed. No runtime code changed, so no local runtime tests were needed. No Test Plan or TDD declaration was present; TDD omission is advisory.
  • check-review-feedback.sh returned CLEAR: zero formal reviews and zero inline comments.
  • gh pr checks 169 shows all seven checks passing; merge state is CLEAN.
  • However, loom-daemon forge wait-checks 169 --timeout 20 returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT ... (required-contexts-unknown), with required-context lookup for main failed: classic branch-protection lookup failed: gh api graphql failed: gh: Resource not accessible by integration. This is an access limitation, not an observed test failure. The approval gate could not verify required contexts.

Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested for a fresh Judge pass after the CI reader can inspect required contexts. No approval verdict is being issued.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: code review passed. The 7 checks listed by gh pr checks are green on 466cdad, but post-verdict.sh's exact-head CI gate refused the approval. Its reader returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown) because the branch-protection lookup failed with "Resource not accessible by integration" (a token-permission problem on this host). I did not bypass the gate. Releasing the claim and leaving loom:review-requested so a later pass can approve once the reader works.

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). and removed loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Oct 8, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge evaluation of head 466cdad found no blocking documentation issues. The corrected ratios match the committed table; the noise assessment is operator-reported in #167, not independently measured. git diff --check passed, gh pr checks reported all seven checks passing, merge state is CLEAN, and check-review-feedback.sh reported CLEAR. No local Rust tests were run for this two-Markdown-file diff. No TDD declaration was provided (advisory for documentation).

Approval remains unposted: post-verdict.sh refused because the installed loom-daemon 0.19.624 does not support forge wait-checks; the approval gate requires 0.19.707 or newer. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for re-evaluation after the daemon is updated.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review of head 466cdad: no blocking findings in the two-file documentation diff. README.md and docs/benchmarks.md now include the 1,000-filament exception requested in #167. Recomputed table ratios with awk: 31/10=3.100, 21/13=1.615, 4.52/2.06=2.194, 103.7/83.4=1.243; these support the rounded speed summaries. The within-noise characterization comes from the operator statement in #167; timing variance was not independently measured.

Verification: git diff --check origin/main...HEAD passed; local tests skipped for Markdown-only changes per scoped-test policy. No Test Plan or TDD line is present (advisory only). check-review-feedback.sh returned CLEAR with zero formal reviews and zero inline comments. gh pr checks reports all seven visible checks passing; mergeStateStatus is CLEAN.

Approval remains pending: loom-daemon forge wait-checks 169 --timeout 20 returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown), because the branch-protection lookup failed with Resource not accessible by integration. The mandatory approval gate is therefore inconclusive. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a later pass once the credential can read branch-protection requirements.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: code review passed (docs claims verified against the Speed table; all 7 CI checks pass per gh pr checks; no outstanding formal reviews). Could not post the approval: post-verdict.sh's exact-head CI gate reports required-contexts-unknown because the worker token gets "Resource not accessible by integration" reading main's branch protection. Releasing the claim and leaving loom:review-requested for a pass with a token that can read it.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code review passed for head 466cdad, but approval remains pending because Loom could not verify required CI contexts.

Reviewed the complete two-file diff and the benchmark table. The documented ratios agree with its entries: 31/10 = 3.1, 21/13 = 1.62, 4.52/2.06 = 2.19, and 103.7/83.4 = 1.24. Both summaries now acknowledge the 73 ms versus 69 ms exception. The noise characterization is supplied by issue #167; benchmark variance was not independently measured.

Validation: git diff --check origin/main...HEAD passed; git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main HEAD exited 0; check-review-feedback.sh returned CLEAR with no formal reviews or inline comments; gh pr checks 169 reported all seven checks passing. No local executable tests were needed for this prose-only change. No Test Plan or TDD declaration was provided (advisory).

Approval gate: loom-daemon forge wait-checks 169 --timeout 20 returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT ... (required-contexts-unknown), with classic branch-protection lookup failed: gh api graphql failed: gh: Resource not accessible by integration. Waiting cannot resolve this credential permission limitation. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested for a later pass with access to the required-context configuration. No approval verdict is being issued.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed for head 466cdad. The diff updates only README.md and docs/benchmarks.md. Reading the benchmark table and calculating 31/10, 21/13, 4.52/2.06, and 103.7/83.4 gives 3.100x, 1.615x, 2.194x, and 1.243x, consistent with the rounded summaries; both summaries now acknowledge the 73 ms versus 69 ms exception. The noise characterization follows the operator's report in #167; I did not independently measure timing variability. git diff --check passed, and git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main HEAD completed without conflicts. No executable changes, so local Rust tests were not run. No Test Plan or TDD line is present; advisory only. check-review-feedback.sh returned CLEAR, with zero formal reviews and inline comments. gh pr checks reports all seven checks passing, and mergeStateStatus is CLEAN. Approval remains unverified because loom-daemon forge wait-checks returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown), with: required-context lookup for main failed: classic branch-protection lookup failed: gh api graphql failed: gh: Resource not accessible by integration. Waiting cannot resolve this credential permission refusal. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested so a later Judge can approve once the required-context read is available.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review could not publish an approval: post-verdict.sh exited 5 because installed loom-daemon 0.19.623 lacks forge wait-checks (gate requires >=0.19.707). gh pr checks 169 reports all seven checks passing; review-feedback gate is CLEAR. Prose matches the table ratios on head 466cdad; original timings/noise characterization were not remeasured. No blocking diff findings. Leaving loom:review-requested and releasing my claim for re-evaluation with a compatible daemon.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code and documentation evaluation passed, and GitHub reports all seven checks successful on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116. However, this host's installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks, so the mandatory exact-head gate in post-verdict.sh refused to post approval. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place for a fresh Judge pass after the installed daemon is resynced. No verdict label was written.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Standing down: re-checked labels immediately before writing my verdict and found loom:reviewing removed. Another Judge or claim reconciler changed the state while I was reviewing, so I am discarding my approval and not writing any verdict label.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge: content review passed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116; the revised benchmark claims match the table, all seven visible GitHub checks pass, merge state is CLEAN, and formal-review reconciliation is CLEAR. Approval was not posted because post-verdict.sh refused on its exact-head CI gate: the installed loom-daemon does not support forge wait-checks, so the authoritative CI state is unreadable. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a later pass after the installed daemon is resynced.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code/documentation evaluation passed, and a live gh pr checks snapshot showed all 7 checks passing with merge state CLEAN. However, the enforced exact-head approval gate could not read the branch's required-context set (Resource not accessible by integration) and refused the approval as LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown).

Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place. A later Judge pass with sufficient forge visibility can post the verdict; no approval label was written.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Standing down: the final live label recheck found loom:reviewing removed while I was evaluating head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116. The documentation review found no blocking issue, but the claim-loss guard requires discarding my verdict; no verdict labels were written. This host also cannot run the mandatory exact-head approval gate because its installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed for 466cdad: no blocking findings in the two-file documentation diff. Benchmark ratios checked against the table (3.10, 1.62, 2.19, 1.24); git diff --check passed; gh pr checks reported seven passing checks; formal-review gate returned CLEAR. Approval was not posted: post-verdict.sh refused because installed loom-daemon 0.19.623 lacks forge wait-checks (required floor 0.19.707). Releasing my claim and leaving loom:review-requested for a host with an updated daemon. This comment is not a workflow approval.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code and documentation evaluation passed on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: the revised ratios match the benchmark table, git diff --check passed, all seven GitHub checks are green, merge state is CLEAN, and formal review reconciliation is CLEAR. Approval was not posted because the mandatory exact-head CI gate refused to run with this host's stale loom-daemon 0.19.623 (it lacks forge wait-checks; required floor 0.19.707). A current daemon could not be built because cargo is unavailable on this host. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a fresh Judge pass after the daemon is rolled; no verdict label was written.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge evaluation completed cleanly on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: benchmark ratios were independently recalculated, git diff --check passed, every GitHub check reported passing, merge state is CLEAN, and formal-review reconciliation is CLEAR. Approval was not posted because the local loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks; post-verdict.sh correctly failed closed on the unavailable exact-head CI reader. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for re-evaluation on a host with a current daemon.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed successfully on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: documentation claims and arithmetic were verified, all seven GitHub checks report passing, merge state is CLEAN, and formal/inline review feedback is clear. Approval could not be recorded because this host's installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks, so post-verdict.sh failed closed on its exact-head CI gate. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a fresh Judge pass after the daemon is resynced; no approval label was written.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: no blocking findings in the documentation correction. The revised ratios match the committed benchmark table; git diff --check passed; all seven checks shown by gh pr checks 169 pass; merge state is CLEAN; and formal/inline feedback is CLEAR. The benchmark variance claim was not independently remeasured; ‘within noise’ is sourced to issue #167. No executable tests apply to this Markdown-only diff, and the missing Test Plan/TDD line is advisory.\n\nApproval was not posted because the mandatory exact-head gate returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown): this credential cannot read main's branch-protection requirements (Resource not accessible by integration). Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested for a later pass with sufficient access.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: no blocking findings. The revised benchmark ratios independently recompute to 3.10×, 1.62×, 2.19×, and 1.24×; git diff --check passed; all seven checks reported by gh pr checks 169 pass; merge state is CLEAN; and formal/inline review feedback is CLEAR.

Approval was not posted because the mandatory exact-head CI gate in post-verdict.sh failed closed: this host's installed loom-daemon does not support forge wait-checks. I did not bypass the gate. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested for a later Judge pass after the daemon is updated.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Documentation review passed for head 466cdad; approval remains pending CI verification.

Reviewed both changed files against issue #167 and the existing benchmark table. The 1,000-filament exception matches the recorded 73 ms versus 69 ms. Calculated table ratios with awk: 31/10 = 3.100, 21/13 = 1.615, 4.52/2.06 = 2.194, and 103.7/83.4 = 1.243, consistent with the rounded summary. The within-noise characterization is supplied by the issue author; benchmark variability was not independently remeasured.

Verification: the isolated worktree HEAD matches the PR head and its working tree is clean; git diff --check origin/main...HEAD passes. Paginated changed-files API lists only README.md and docs/benchmarks.md. No executable changes require local runtime tests. No Test Plan or TDD line is present (advisory only). check-review-feedback.sh reports CLEAR, with zero formal reviews and inline comments. gh pr checks reports all seven checks passing; merge state is CLEAN.

Approval gate limitation: loom-daemon forge wait-checks 169 --timeout 20 returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown), with: "required-context lookup for main failed: classic branch-protection lookup failed: gh api graphql failed: gh: Resource not accessible by integration". Required-check coverage therefore remains unverified despite the visible green checks. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested for a later verification pass.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge evaluation completed successfully, but no approval verdict was posted: this host's loom-daemon is 0.19.623 and lacks the required exact-head forge wait-checks gate (requires ≥0.19.707). post-verdict.sh correctly refused the approval. A local daemon rebuild was attempted from Loom source 0.19.963, but this host has no cargo executable.

Review evidence on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116:

  • benchmark ratios re-derived from the committed table: 3.100×, 1.615×, 2.194×, 1.243×; revised rounded prose is supported;
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD passed;
  • all 7 GitHub checks reported pass via gh pr checks 169;
  • merge state was CLEAN;
  • formal/inline review gate was CLEAR (0 reviews, 0 unresolved threads).

Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place. A later Judge with a current daemon must re-check the head and CI, then post the guarded verdict.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code review passed: the revised prose matches the benchmark table, the documented ratios were independently re-derived, all seven GitHub CI checks are green on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116, merge state is clean, and formal review feedback is clear.

I could not post the approval verdict because this host's installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks; the mandatory exact-head CI gate in post-verdict.sh therefore failed closed (exit 5). Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place for a fresh Judge pass after the installed daemon is resynced. No approval label was written.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge evaluation completed successfully for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: the revised ratios match the benchmark table, all seven checks shown by gh pr checks 169 pass, merge state is CLEAN, and formal review/inline feedback is CLEAR.

I am not issuing an approval label because the mandatory exact-head CI gate in post-verdict.sh cannot run with this host's installed loom-daemon 0.19.623 (forge wait-checks is unavailable). The posting mechanism refused the approval and posted no verdict. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place for a fresh Judge pass after the daemon is updated.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code and documentation evaluation passed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116, and all seven checks visible through gh pr checks report passing. However, Loom's exact-head approval gate could not read required-context metadata (Resource not accessible by integration) and therefore failed closed with LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown). No approval was posted. Releasing the Judge claim and leaving loom:review-requested in place for a later pass with readable CI metadata.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code and documentation evaluation passed, and gh pr checks reported all seven checks green on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116. However, the mandatory exact-head approval gate refused the verdict because the installed loom-daemon does not provide forge wait-checks, so CI state is unreadable to post-verdict.sh and no approval was posted.

Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place for a fresh Judge pass after the installed daemon is resynced. Review evidence: benchmark ratios were independently recomputed; git diff --check passed; merge state was CLEAN; formal/inline feedback reconciliation was CLEAR.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Review completed for head 466cdad; no blocking documentation findings.

The paginated files API lists only README.md and docs/benchmarks.md. Reading the Speed table against the diff confirms the 73 ms versus 69 ms exception and the rounded speed ratios (31/10 = 3.10, 21/13 = 1.62, 4.52/2.06 = 2.19, 103.7/83.4 = 1.24). The noise characterization follows the operator's statement in #167; I did not rerun benchmarks. git diff --check passed in the worktree at the reviewed SHA. No runtime tests were needed for this prose-only change. No TDD line or Test Plan was supplied; advisory only.

check-review-feedback.sh returned CLEAR (0 formal reviews, 0 inline comments, 0 unresolved threads). gh pr checks 169 reports all seven visible checks passing, and mergeStateStatus is CLEAN.

Approval remains conditional: loom-daemon forge wait-checks 169 --timeout 20 returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT (required-contexts-unknown), with “Resource not accessible by integration” while reading branch protection. Required contexts could not be verified. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested for a later review with a functioning CI gate.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code review passed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: benchmark arithmetic and prose are consistent, all seven GitHub checks report passing, merge state is CLEAN, and the formal-review gate is clear. I could not post the approval verdict because the installed loom-daemon 0.19.623 lacks the required forge wait-checks exact-head CI gate; post-verdict.sh correctly failed closed and posted no verdict. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a fresh Judge pass after the daemon is updated.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed successfully for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: documentation values were independently recalculated, all seven GitHub checks pass, merge state is CLEAN, and formal-review reconciliation is CLEAR. Approval could not be posted because the installed loom-daemon 0.19.623 lacks the exact-head forge wait-checks gate required by post-verdict.sh; the script failed closed and posted no verdict. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested in place for a fresh Judge pass after the daemon is updated.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code and documentation evaluation passed on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: the benchmark ratios and wording match the table, git diff --check passes, merge state is CLEAN, all seven checks visible through gh pr checks are green, and formal review feedback is clear. However, Loom's exact-head approval gate could not read required branch-protection contexts (GitHub returned Resource not accessible by integration) and refused approval with exit 5. Releasing loom:reviewing and leaving loom:review-requested for a later Judge pass; no verdict label was written.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review passed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116: benchmark arithmetic and prose are consistent, all seven checks visible through gh pr checks pass, merge state is CLEAN, and formal-review reconciliation is CLEAR. The guarded approval writer refused to post because this host's installed loom-daemon lacks forge wait-checks, so exact-head CI state is unreadable to the mandatory gate. Releasing loom:reviewing and retaining loom:review-requested; no verdict label was written.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch

loom-fleet-dispatch Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Code/documentation evaluation passed, and gh pr checks 169 reports all seven checks passing on head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116. However, the mandatory exact-head approval gate could not read required branch-protection contexts because the current GitHub App token received Resource not accessible by integration; post-verdict.sh therefore refused to post or label the approval. I released loom:reviewing and left loom:review-requested for a later Judge with sufficient CI-read permissions.

@loom-fleet-dispatch

loom-fleet-dispatch Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Judge review completed for head 466cdad23740be7cf46773c14897dcc56885a116; approval remains pending CI-gate verification. This corrects the approval wording initially posted in this comment.

Reviewed the two-file diff against the benchmark table. Both summaries now except the 1,000-filament row (73 ms versus 69 ms), and the rounded speedup figures agree with the table. The within-noise characterization comes from issue #167; variability was not independently measured. No blocking content findings.

Verification: git diff --check HEAD~1 HEAD produced no findings; gh pr checks 169 listed seven passing checks; check-review-feedback.sh returned CLEAR with zero formal reviews and zero inline comments. No executable code changed, so local Rust tests were not run. No Test Plan or TDD declaration was supplied (advisory).

Loom's required approval gate returned LOOM-CHECKS-TIMEOUT ... (required-contexts-unknown) with: required-context lookup for main failed: classic branch-protection lookup failed: gh api graphql failed: gh: Resource not accessible by integration. Approval cannot be issued until the gate can read required contexts. Released loom:reviewing and retained loom:review-requested for re-evaluation.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

loom:review-requested PR ready for Judge to review. Applied by: Builder when opening PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

benchmarks.md summary contradicts its own 1,000-filament row

0 participants