Skip to content

BYOL 5.2 docs - #1202

Open
haberkornsam wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
shaberkorn/byol-52-docs
Open

haberkornsam wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
shaberkorn/byol-52-docs

Conversation

@haberkornsam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Updated artifactory references to SSR Software Access (including new screenshots)

  • Updated sizing recommendations for AWS and GCP

  • General BYOL release updates

  • Wait for BYOL to actually be published before merging


| AWS Instance Type | Comperable SSR Model | Max vNICs Supported | vCPU Cores | Memory (GiB) |
| ----------------- | -------------------- | ------------------- | ------ | -- |
| c5n.xlarge | SSR120, SSR400, SSR440 | 4 | 4 | 10.5 |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is really 10.5?


The following instance types are supported for virtual SSR in Azure. Choose the size that best meets your requirements. More information can be found in the [Azure Documentation](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/sizes).

| Recommended Azure VM Size | Max vNICs Supported | vCPU Cores | Memory |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing the Comparable hardware model column

Session Smart Router Size recommendatations can be found in [System Requirements](intro_system_reqs.md).

:::note
Recommendations are based strictly on hardware equivalency, matching vCPU and memory specifications of physical SSR appliance models models

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same note for Azure?

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
<!--- BYOL AWS Instance Types -->

@agrawalkaushik agrawalkaushik Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@haberkornsam @Chr1st0ph3rTurn3r we should integrate this into the new Deployment Guides too (for all the clouds)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely. I'll do that.

@MichaelBaj MichaelBaj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, aside from addressing some comments from @agrawalkaushik.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants