Non-testing parsing/unparsing tests

[rlaemmel]

In addition to the naming issues, noted in another issue, these tests don't make much sense as such:

https://github.com/101companies/101simplejava/tree/master/contributions/javaSyb/src/test/java/org/softlang/company/tests

They are not really testing much as than doing some file I/O.

This needs to be improved.

I copied this approach over to javaReflection. So this is also a problem there and probably in several other implementations.

[tbernau]

The purpose of these tests was to cover the features. They are meant as a mix of proof of functionality and simple use case. I don't really see how they could be usefully (!) improved other than trying to cover a given technology's functionality further which is probably beyond the purpose of the implementations.